It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
The Witcher 3: Wild HuntHelp deciding if to take quest - "A Deadly Plot"(12 posts)(12 posts)
(12 posts)
Pages:
1
This is my favourite topic
Posted June 04, 2015
(minor spoilers regarding how i got this lvl 14 quest)
Dijxstra suggested me a plot to kill king radovid and tbh i don't even know why he asked me this, even geralt himself said he don't kill kings (and i add - not even plotting for that goal), adding to the fact in the witcher 2 we fought the king(s) slayer letho .... i don't want to accept this quest but ... its a quest ...... should i just ignore it or take it anyway just to be done with another quest ? what u guys did ?
No posts in this topic were marked as the solution yet. If you can help, add your reply
Posted June 04, 2015
You can take it, you won't ever be a kingslayer :)
Posted June 04, 2015
***** END GAME SPOILER *****

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
There are 3 possible outcomes for Redania:

1. Radovid defeats Emhyr. Massive witch/non-human/herbalist/healer (etc.) hunt begins. 'Freedom' worse than servitude.
2. Emhyr wins and rules the entire north. Temeria is made a vassal state of Nilfgaard.
3. Dijkstra kills his fellow king-slayer plotters to prevent Temeria signing truce with Nilfgaard. He secures Redania and stops senseless mage hunts. Economy and industrialisation boom.

To get either 2 or 3 you MUST complete this quest, and 3 other quests later on in the game.
Posted June 05, 2015
avatar
YrdenNerf: (minor spoilers regarding how i got this lvl 14 quest)
Dijxstra suggested me a plot to kill king radovid and tbh i don't even know why he asked me this, even geralt himself said he don't kill kings (and i add - not even plotting for that goal), adding to the fact in the witcher 2 we fought the king(s) slayer letho .... i don't want to accept this quest but ... its a quest ...... should i just ignore it or take it anyway just to be done with another quest ? what u guys did ?
Take it, if only for the sake of reconnecting with yet another old friend.
Posted June 05, 2015
avatar
Hickory: ***** END GAME SPOILER *****

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
There are 3 possible outcomes for Redania:

1. Radovid defeats Emhyr. Massive witch/non-human/herbalist/healer (etc.) hunt begins. 'Freedom' worse than servitude.
2. Emhyr wins and rules the entire north. Temeria is made a vassal state of Nilfgaard.
3. Dijkstra kills his fellow king-slayer plotters to prevent Temeria signing truce with Nilfgaard. He secures Redania and stops senseless mage hunts. Economy and industrialisation boom.

To get either 2 or 3 you MUST complete this quest, and 3 other quests later on in the game.
God damn it man...You sure about the 3rd outcome? That would be great but I don't want to kill those king-slayer plotters :/
Posted June 05, 2015
avatar
sariaen: God damn it man...You sure about the 3rd outcome? That would be great but I don't want to kill those king-slayer plotters :/
Yep, he comes in quoting poetry, and then states there will be no truce. His men appear and he gives Geralt the chance to just walk away.

Edit: Note that Geralt does not do the killing, he just has to walk away, and have nothing more to do with it. It's a really bitter pill, but if you can look past Dijkstra -- all leaders are corrupt -- and think of the people, it's the best ending.
Post edited June 05, 2015 by Hickory
Posted June 05, 2015
avatar
sariaen: God damn it man...You sure about the 3rd outcome? That would be great but I don't want to kill those king-slayer plotters :/
avatar
Hickory: Yep, he comes in quoting poetry, and then states there will be no truce. His men appear and he gives Geralt the chance to just walk away.

Edit: Note that Geralt does not do the killing, he just has to walk away, and have nothing more to do with it. It's a really bitter pill, but if you can look past Dijkstra -- all leaders are corrupt -- and think of the people, it's the best ending.
Damn....Nilfgaard is bad, Radowid is bad, Dijkstra is weird, scary, and bad....I kind of liked Roche. However, regaining Temeria at a cost of millions of innocent lifes? Damn...that man is nuts.
Posted June 05, 2015
avatar
sariaen: I kind of liked Roche.
Roche would have made a terrible ruler. He's a hot headed idealist, and naive to the trappings of real (political) power. Great spy, lousy head of state.
Posted June 05, 2015
avatar
sariaen: I kind of liked Roche.
avatar
Hickory: Roche would have made a terrible ruler. He's a hot headed idealist, and naive to the trappings of real (political) power. Great spy, lousy head of state.
That is true. On the other hand, why should I get involved in the first place? People are not standing up for each other. They would sell their kin for a mear copper. Why should I decide about their fate and care about their well being? During my 2nd playthrough I witnessed more than I should :P I think this time I will just ignore the whole thing. I am moving to Kovir in the end after all :D
Posted June 05, 2015
avatar
Hickory: Roche would have made a terrible ruler. He's a hot headed idealist, and naive to the trappings of real (political) power. Great spy, lousy head of state.
avatar
sariaen: That is true. On the other hand, why should I get involved in the first place? People are not standing up for each other. They would sell their kin for a mear copper. Why should I decide about their fate and care about their well being? During my 2nd playthrough I witnessed more than I should :P I think this time I will just ignore the whole thing. I am moving to Kovir in the end after all :D
Neutrality does have its price.
Posted June 05, 2015
avatar
sariaen: That is true. On the other hand, why should I get involved in the first place? People are not standing up for each other. They would sell their kin for a mear copper. Why should I decide about their fate and care about their well being? During my 2nd playthrough I witnessed more than I should :P I think this time I will just ignore the whole thing. I am moving to Kovir in the end after all :D
avatar
sparking_spirit: Neutrality does have its price.
Somehow I do not mind. I get the best woman on the face of this world who will support me until I die, and this will take me a while, peace and quiet, not to mention ocassional freelance contracts to not get out of shape. Is there a place like Kovir in real life? Let me know if you find it :P
Posted June 05, 2015
avatar
sparking_spirit: Neutrality does have its price.
avatar
sariaen: Somehow I do not mind. I get the best woman on the face of this world who will support me until I die, and this will take me a while, peace and quiet, not to mention ocassional freelance contracts to not get out of shape. Is there a place like Kovir in real life? Let me know if you find it :P
Oh of course it's your choice, and as long as it works for you it's a good one.
Who can really predict what you do today can affect things so dramatically in the future?

Besides, who said Witchers should be responsible for these problems?
Pages:
1
This is my favourite topic
Community
The Witcher 3: Wild HuntHelp deciding if to take quest - "A Deadly Plot"(12 posts)(12 posts)
(12 posts)