It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
It's very much a Mass Effect 2 or Dragon Age type situation where the main game is DRM free but the DLC, some of it which seems to have been removed for the purpose of being DLC, is not.

It's up to you whether you think that violates GOG's "100% DRM free" statement. I think "100%" covers patches and DLC as well, but others disagree and say the main game is DRM free and that is all that matters.

In any case we are supposed to get an updated download when all the patches and DLC are out which combined everything into one DRM free package, so there's no sense complaining much.
GoG is providing you the ability to play the game itself without being online, without having to register if you choose, and without a disc. DRM is a damn nightmare and if you can't see that GoG did something great here to make your ownership a little easier...well, go ahead and play with the DRM on legitimate songs between devices, digital movies, Ubisoft style games (google Silent Hunter 5 or Assassin's Creed to see my point) , and I'll bet you stop complaining.

I am upset with the current server issue and dlc problems as well but I fail to understand why people are raging over this. The devs posted that they are on it early this morning, they are not ignoring their customers. This is a great studio that put out a AAA title, are providing free content, and GoG took it further by offering it DRM free. Be thankful...DRM has spiraled out of control imo.
avatar
Destroyer733: To be fair in regards to patches, i'm pretty sure you don't need to register at all for patches. As there is a separate patcher.exe you can run, and I ran before I had registered my game. This checked my version and reported it as up to date. So all this "register for patches" stuff people are spouting is nonsense. Also they have not yet actually released a patch yet post launch. So what's to say they won't have a section on the website that will let you download patches from there? Everyone seems to be jumping the gun on this stuff.
The registration code you get when you buy the game is for one purpose only: to register to get patches (and DLC). They stated on their official site (before it went down) that this would be the ONLY way to get patches. They said there would not be stand-alone patches available. This is from the devs themselves. I'd link it, but their site isn't fully functional yet.

Nissa: we may not completely agree, but thank you for the civil discourse. Enjoy your day as well. :)
avatar
Coelocanth: The registration code you get when you buy the game is for one purpose only: to register to get patches (and DLC). They stated on their official site (before it went down) that this would be the ONLY way to get patches. They said there would not be stand-alone patches available. This is from the devs themselves. I'd link it, but their site isn't fully functional yet.
I don't remember reading that.
avatar
nissa: The base game comes with no DRM whatsoever, the patches and subsequent DLCs do not. Everyone had (and still has) the choice not to abide by such a rules before purchasing the game.
When exactly did CDP state that patches and DLC would involve DRM? All the publicity I've seen was about the DRM-free goodness available from GOG itself. I would agree with Coelocanth here, slipping DRM into patches (which, let's be honest, are likely to be essential) is really being deceptive (which is why I've boycotted Stardock for the last few years since their "DRM-free" GalCiv 2).

On the other hand, the first patch is available as an offline download, so if there has been a change of policy then perhaps someone could provide a relevant link?
avatar
nissa: What I don't understand is what prevents you from moving your computer downstairs, the time to register your game, download the extra content, and then move it back upstairs ? What prevents you from looking for a solution to connect a computer, that you obviously seem to dedicate to gaming, to the Net ? What prevents you from playing the game on another computer, connected to the Net ?
Internet connection is not a trivial matter, especially if you're going to keep your system secure in the process. You need to select, install and configure a firewall (no, Windows' built-in one is nowhere near effective enough), configure network setup (installing adaptor and driver, setting up encryption for wireless) and possibly install system components (if you're running a customised version of Windows with networking functions disabled or removed).
avatar
nissa: In my opinion, it is unreasonable to expect a gaming computer not to be connected to the Net in 2011. It is unreasonable to expect companies not to attempt getting their customers to register their games, to keep them up to date, especially if they're up front about it, like CDP has been.
Well, I am in the same position as Coelocanth - my gaming system is offline and will remain so as it allows me to game without online distractions (which has meant relying on the services of Mr SKiDROW to play my retail copy - I'm not prepared to pay a second, higher, price for the GOG release).

There are however plenty of other people who will not have the option of connecting online - their access may be costly (dialup/mobile) or they maybe somewhere with strictly limited (see Kainvorador549's post) network access. Making online access mandatory rather than optional will therefore always disenfranchise a part of the gaming population.

The downside that affects everyone though is the problem of server (and company) longevity, which you note yourself.
This is just being ridiculous. The game plays out of the gate. This "DRM" as you label it, in no way impedes your ability to play the game you paid for.

The patch is provided as an offline download as pointed out.

I see zero reason for a company to provide DLC to people who haven't registered the game. That's just stupid.

Even Stardock follows this business model.
avatar
dustinvoliva: This is just being ridiculous. The game plays out of the gate. This "DRM" as you label it, in no way impedes your ability to play the game you paid for.

The patch is provided as an offline download as pointed out.
The zero day patch. And that's because - surprise - there are issues with the servers. They stated unequivocally that there will be no off-line patches and that patches will be available only through the in-game updater.

avatar
dustinvoliva: I see zero reason for a company to provide DLC to people who haven't registered the game. That's just stupid.
Nor do I. Personally, I have no issue with DLC requiring registration. It's extra, bonus content, so by all means use DRM if you want.

avatar
dustinvoliva: Even Stardock follows this business model.
I wouldn't hold them up as a paradigm of all that's right with publishing. I was once a supporter of them until they showed themselves for what they really are.
Post edited May 20, 2011 by Coelocanth