Sadly, I haven't played any of the Sands of Time series (I know, I know...) but in response to the long rant about how it's closer to actual Persian mythology, I have to point out that, as true as that is, it's not close to the internal mythology of the games. The games are the Arabian Nights styled Persia, the fantastical Persia of glorious and beautiful cities rising from the sand, as bastions of not only might, but intellect as well. WW clashes too heavily with that.

Really that's the problem. If it was a seperate continuity, like the 2008 one, well, people would still complain, but it would be more acceptable, and easier to brush of their criticism of 'it's not Prince of Persia'.

Well, that's my opinion, at least. I hope it makes sense. And I will note that I would be plenty glad to see the game here, and I would probably buy it at some point.

Then it's not a Persian settled game, but an Arabian.

There, you found the problem: Wrong nomenclature.

Yo I love the series I just bought POP Warrior Within and am curently at the second fight with the lady in black trying to save the lady in red but so far I think the game is great!! Also sands of time is good to though I only played it once and at a friends place. But POP WW is the best yet!!

Glad to hear that, bro.
Don't forget to vote it for next wanted GoG release:
http://www.gog.com/en/wanted/

Nice! Thanks for the heads up on the voting page I voted for POP WW and all POP titles. Have a good one:D