Darling_Jimmy: It sounds like a good idea to me. Just like smoking laws are designed to make smoking so excruciatingly tedious that people will hopefully stop smoking rather than put up with a pile of crap: the more trouble it is for a company to DRM its virtual products, the greater likelihood they will stop doing it.

Wishbone: The problem is that this would be a lot of trouble for their customers too. That is, if they really do mean "on paper", as in a formula with the customer's signature on it.

El_Caz: You should still check your browser apps since the vulnerability is not through the installed game, but through your browser.

Darling_Jimmy: I hope that it is. People are too apathetic for their own good. Maybe filling out an application to play a game will cause some to think about what these companies are actually asking them to part with.

Wishbone: True. And many would simply just not buy anything that required them to go through such an arduous process, forcing publishers to refrain from using the tactics that made it necessary in the first place. I'd count that as a win :-)