It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Darling_Jimmy: Oh, start with the song Revolution 9. That is a good introduction to what the Beatles are all about. Also, buy Masters of Orion 3 and VR Soccer '96!
Bwahahahaha hahahaha ahahahaha hahahaha!!!!

That is the funniest thing I've read in quite a while!
avatar
cogadh: The lawsuits between Apple and Apple Corps were settled quite a while ago (the last one in 2007, I believe), the major holdout on this has been the surviving Beatles and the estates of the deceased Beatles being of the opinion that the quality of digital music formats could not do the songs justice. Arguments about the validity of that opinion aside, I'm pretty sure they finally realized just how much money they were losing out on by not selling their songs through iTunes.
I always felt the "digital formats not good enough" argument to be suspect when considering lossless codecs like FLAC that have been around for most of the past decade - not to mention Apple has for some time been supporting lossless themselves.
Also when one considers the quality of the majority of audio equipment (i.e. car radios, record players, etc.) that was used during that era to listen the music, the argument becomes that much weaker. Thankfully common sense eventually came through when they released the "better than CD quality (24 bit 44.1kHz FLACS)" of the stereo box set on USB drive.
Revolver or Rubber Soul. Both especially accessible. A little more accessible than their earliest stuff might be, even though their earliest stuff was all about being accessible, because the songs have a little more variety and are a little more adult. Their earliest super teeny bopper stuff was great fun, but more one-note.
I'm looking forward to get higher-quality versions of the Beatles music on The Pirate Bay, indeed. Never purchased a single bit from CrapTunes and I wont' start now. I don't buy digital shit (except for old games on GOG, of course), I prefer physical disks.
avatar
KingofGnG: I'm looking forward to get higher-quality versions of the Beatles music on The Pirate Bay, indeed. Never purchased a single bit from CrapTunes and I wont' start now. I don't buy digital shit (except for old games on GOG, of course), I prefer physical disks.
Lose that negative attitude towards Apple. It makes you look like a fanboy.
Post edited November 17, 2010 by uulav
avatar
KingofGnG: I'm looking forward to get higher-quality versions of the Beatles music on The Pirate Bay, indeed. Never purchased a single bit from CrapTunes and I wont' start now. I don't buy digital shit (except for old games on GOG, of course), I prefer physical disks.
So...apparently all music CD store has been extinct from Italy? If not, I'm sure any medium-sized store will sell Beatles album since you prefer physical discs so much.
avatar
Catshade: So...apparently all music CD store has been extinct from Italy? If not, I'm sure any medium-sized store will sell Beatles album since you prefer physical discs so much.
I don't like them that much so I don't buy the music. Actually, I won't even download their songs for real because I have better things to do....
avatar
uulav: Lose that negative attitude towards Apple. It makes you look like a fanboy.
Why should I do something like this? Hating Apple is a healthy thing to do, they deserve it...
Post edited November 17, 2010 by KingofGnG
avatar
rampancy: I actually thought it was just a track of John Lennon saying the words "Number Nine"; it actually sounds really interesting with the added stuff in the background. I have to confess though, hearing all of that gibberish reminded me of the eerie conspiracy theories thinking that one of the Beatles (Paul, I think?) died and was secretly replaced, the evidence of their switch secretly hidden amongst their songs.
Incidentally it isn't even Lennon saying "Number 9", it was a recording they found in the studio archives and John liked how he said "Number 9" so he looped it.
Yeah because a lossy version of The Beatles is just what I need.
avatar
Darling_Jimmy: I have the vinyls.
I have the versions without needle static getting in the way of the music. Just a preference, I guess.
avatar
michaelleung: Yeah because a lossy version of The Beatles is just what I need.
Apple lossless format isn't really "lossy".
avatar
rampancy: So...where would be a good place to start? The White Album?
Start with the White Album. I did. If I would have started with Hard day's night, I probably wouldn't have given them a chance to become a favorite.
Post edited November 17, 2010 by deelee74
avatar
Darling_Jimmy: I have the vinyls.
avatar
deelee74: I have the versions without needle static getting in the way of the music. Just a preference, I guess.
avatar
michaelleung: Yeah because a lossy version of The Beatles is just what I need.
avatar
deelee74: Apple lossless format isn't really "lossy".
avatar
rampancy: So...where would be a good place to start? The White Album?
avatar
deelee74: Start with the White Album. I did. If I would have started with Hard day's night, I probably wouldn't have given them a chance to become a favorite.
In any case, it's The Beatles. You're a real fan if you buy it on an intangible medium!

All I'm saying is this, really iTunes? I'm sure it's a good thing for the whole generation who haven't heard about them. But honestly, it took you way too long.
avatar
rampancy: So...where would be a good place to start? The White Album?
avatar
cogadh: Meet the Beatles/With the Beatles, A Hard Days Night or Help! are pretty good starting points. The White Album is a definite "must have", but it would be much better for someone starting a Beatles collection to go back to before the latter half of their career to get a sense of the band's evolution. I would throw the White Album, Rubber Soul, Sgt. Pepper or Revolver in for a second purchase then Abbey Road or Let It Be as a third. Any mix of those albums will give you a great sense of the band beyond just their well-known hits.
I prefer Meet the Beat-Alls: http://www.amazon.com/Powerpuff-Girls-Meet-Beat-Alls/dp/B00005TNUW

Yes, this episode is full of the most awesome Beatles references.
avatar
deelee74: I have the versions without needle static getting in the way of the music. Just a preference, I guess.



Apple lossless format isn't really "lossy".



Start with the White Album. I did. If I would have started with Hard day's night, I probably wouldn't have given them a chance to become a favorite.
avatar
michaelleung: In any case, it's The Beatles. You're a real fan if you buy it on an intangible medium!

All I'm saying is this, really iTunes? I'm sure it's a good thing for the whole generation who haven't heard about them. But honestly, it took you way too long.
I bought that CD Box set when it came out. If I hadn't, I probably would have just bought the itunes version yesterday. I'm a complete convert to the whole digital media thing. Having a CD in my hands doesn't thrill me at all. I buy music for the music, and if I can get that music a little cheaper by buying the downloadable version of it, then I am all for that.
That said, the beatles stuff on itunes isn't discounted. It costs the same as it does on CD at Best Buy.

I'm a Beatles fan, but I also think that there are better bands out there. I love Revolver and everything after. Rubber Soul is decent. But the early bubblegum stuff just doesn't do anything for me. They were really the 60's equivalent of the Back Street Boys before they found drugs and the potential that free run of a studio can have.
I think Lennon and McCartney wrote some great music, but I don't think that either of them are the greatest songwriters in the world. You just can't claim that title when you are the one who wrote the "Oh Yoko" or the "Spies Like Us" theme song.
avatar
deelee74: I have the versions without needle static getting in the way of the music. Just a preference, I guess.
I keep my records clean so there is no needle noise. And records have twice the dynamic range of CDs. I am snob.
The complete stereo set is 129.99 at amazon. Why pay more for lesser quality? If they were available in ALAC then fine but they're not.

Apple's biggest problem is that it's too late. This would have been a bigger deal a few years ago before the stereo and mono remeasters came out but everybody major beatles fan probably already bought the set last year or can stll buy it for less now, spend a bit of their time and rip to iTunes or any other player.

People are so misinformed about Vinyl thinking it's nothing but pops and clicks but that's for another time. I buy Vinyl whenever possible unless they butcher the mastering on reissues.
Post edited November 18, 2010 by Kabuto