the_atm: so can someone describe what the games are in a nut-shell than tell me which one is better? I don't really see a difference but than again I dont' know what I'm looking for. Thanks!
If you've played Cannon Fodder, that's something to go on.
Basically it's a tactical action game where you usually control a squad of four cyborg agents. Go with left, shoot with right - oh, and click left + right to make them enter panic mode, go nuts and shoot everything on sight. Rather straight forward fun. You will also research new weapons and other stuff that you can equip your agents with (most notably new organs that basically make them super-human). You have these simple assignments like killing all enemy agents, assassinating a certain character or persuading someone (approaching him with a brainwashing device). Opposed to what you might expect from the screenshots and descriptions both games are actually rather simple action games with a very simple meta game put on top of them (don't expect the map screen and research to be anywhere near as complex as in say the X-Com series). Both provide insane bodycounts and tons of explosions.
As for which one is better: many people seem to prefer the first game, I definitely prefer the second one, Syndicate Wars. Syndicate Wars provides much more interesting missions and generally the better gameplay IMO. A thing that seems to throw people off is the 3D perspective that requires you to turn the camera manually a lot (if you've played Dungeon Keeper or Populous: The Beginning you should actually already be used to that). The second one is a bit more complex in some ways but also more rewarding. For instance in the first game money keeps coming in basically all by itself, in the second one you need to look for occasions to get money during the missions (like robbing banks). The second one also defintely needs you to study the missions and experiment with the equipment a bit more. But to me that makes it the much better game.