Posted November 12, 2014

But in this case it will be impossible to earn money for such projects as gog.com cause they are selling games that 20 years old :))
I remember doing a lot of reading from Richard Stallman (a few years ago) on free software; Programmers and people can still pay to have software modified to their needs or tastes, add updates, new content unofficial patches, etc. Redhat was known for years for charging for their CD's and their OS that you could download for free; BUT what you really paid for was technical support.
It's possible when a game goes open source when copyright ends, merely means that the sources are available. This means you COULD download the sources and the full game, BUT you'd have to compile it yourself, and quite a few people would pay for the simplicity of not having to pull out a compiler, get into the nuances of the source code and other details in order to build their binary of the game.
Copyright with the printed press, you were trading certain freedoms (that you couldn't take advantage of anyways), in order to publish books; The books were accessible by the public so there was no problem. The digital age is quite a bit different and many copyright laws that were applicable in the 1930's don't apply in the 2000's.
But being annoyed at copyright law, or wishing for changes isn't going to make a difference. It probably won't be resolved in my lifetime.