you can report them if you want.

I did report them as spam. But nothing has happened.

Yeah I noticed the same thing when i was looking at the Ultima reviews when it was first released. I give you a high five
*high fives*

It seems the user base, with the influx of many new users for the various "bug hits" of GOG (D&D titles, The Witcher 1&2, etc.), has been diluted - as it is to be expected with so many users, along the normal (or outright exemplary) people, there are many idiots as well who don't care (or even consider) that their actions have consequences for others.

What if somebody bought the game elsewhere and thought it was complete rubbish and therefore doesn't want to waste money buying it again? Limiting it to only people who have bought the game will make it even worse, you will get all the people who obsessively love the game buying it again just to review it highly and because they love it, while those who already had the game, liked it but not enough to buy it again or even hated it will not buy it and so we'll lose their review.

In short, limiting it to those who bought it on GOG could actually lead to the very thing you're trying to stop getting even worse.

This ^^^ Rose Tinted glasses do not make good review spectacles.

I agree. Pink is much better. :)

Anyway, one should always try to remember to have some critical thinking when posting a review and remember that very review may influence someone's decision. With that power comes some responsibility.

But I hope my original post has raised thoughts and questions, and ideas how to improve the review quality.

+1