It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
high rated
avatar
nondeplumage: You can buy a tank, if you have the money. You can even buy a fighter jet, if you have the funds.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend is the stupidest bit of retard wisdom to ever come out of whoever the hell said that. That's the most horrible strategy ever.

And Rush Limbaugh is right, but only by complete accident.
That was awesome. You just insulted two of the biggest, oldest, supposedly wisest people groups in the world.

The Arabs and the Chinese.
avatar
nondeplumage: You can buy a tank, if you have the money. You can even buy a fighter jet, if you have the funds.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend is the stupidest bit of retard wisdom to ever come out of whoever the hell said that. That's the most horrible strategy ever.

And Rush Limbaugh is right, but only by complete accident.
avatar
Runehamster: That was awesome. You just insulted two of the biggest, oldest, supposedly wisest people groups in the world.

The Arabs and the Chinese.
Heh, looking at what happened between the Soviets and Chinese, or Americans and Taliban, I'd say those two groups did a bang-up job tearing that little pearl of wisdom to shreds.
high rated
avatar
Runehamster: That was awesome. You just insulted two of the biggest, oldest, supposedly wisest people groups in the world.

The Arabs and the Chinese.
avatar
Hesusio: Heh, looking at what happened between the Soviets and Chinese, or Americans and Taliban, I'd say those two groups did a bang-up job tearing that little pearl of wisdom to shreds.
True, but still. I just found the comment amusing considering where it came from :D
Sounds like Limbaugh is trying to build what is probably a floundering audience. I can't believe he's still around/relevant. As far as 'Republican' Justices. It isn't uncommon for a President of one party to appoint a guy/gal he thinks will lean his way and they end up being the exact opposite or, at least, less polarized than imagined. The only 'hardcore' conservatives on the Court now are Scalia, Thomas, and Alito. Roberts is fairly moderate. The rest usually lean left to (in some cases) far left.
avatar
michaelleung: Is this topsy turvy day or something? Some guy called into Rush Limbaugh's radio show and talked about the video game law that the Supreme Court was going to vote on, and Rush defended video games by saying those damn liberals this, damn liberals that.
"Join me any time the government tries to impinge on anybody's speech," he said. "Join me when the government tries to tell you can't eat trans fat. Join me when the government gets involved in all these other behavioral and speech things that they try to tell you and control us we can't do: What kind of car we have to drive, whether or not we're responsible for global warming, the kind of lightbulb we have to have, where our thermostats are. Get on board, my buddy. If it's taken a video game to get you interested and have the light go off, to have you see what liberalism is all about, I'm glad to have you on our side, 'cause I agree with you. Leave your game alone. The people that put together these video games are artists in their own right. If you're gonna start saying that video games are raunchy, then how the hell do you leave cable television alone?"
avatar
michaelleung: Okay, what. Last I checked a whole load of those justices were appointed by Republicans so it makes him look like a massive twat. And why should he care? I do think that restricting games is a terrible idea (given that films and such are industry-restricted, not restricted by law) but really, why do we have the people we hate on our side?
The guy is clearly unreasonable and nutty these days, but he's always been strongly against what he sees as abridgment of free speech (he hates the fairness doctrine too). I can't flame the dude for this, he's being 100% consistent with his stance on free speech.
avatar
PoSSeSSeDCoW: I'd be fine with Rush Limbaugh if he actually was in support of small government and upholding the constitution. However, although he actually does things that are in line with these goals, he betrays himself on many other issues, especially his rabid obsession with what people do in their bedroom.
Agreed, but on this issue he is being consistent, this dude has been railing against what he sees as abridgments of free speech since he's been on the air.
Post edited October 30, 2010 by orcishgamer
Well according to that DL Hughly show they had on CNN for a really short while Rush Limbaugh is the Defacto leader of the republican party,

No I Michael Steel am the defacto leader of the republican party and Rush is an entertainer.

PS. I Michael Steel apologize to Mr. Limbaugh for stating that he was an entertainer and not the defacto leader of the republican party. To show how sorry I am I shall be caught using RNC funds to visit a faux lesbian bondage club and endeavor to humiliate myself in various ways.
avatar
orcishgamer: Agreed, but on this issue he is being consistent, this dude has been railing against what he sees as abridgments of free speech since he's been on the air.
Yeah, I tried to say that in my post, but I was unclear. I like that he's being consistent with his views in this action, but find it hard to take him seriously when he holds contradicting views like what I said above.
avatar
orcishgamer: Agreed, but on this issue he is being consistent, this dude has been railing against what he sees as abridgments of free speech since he's been on the air.
avatar
PoSSeSSeDCoW: Yeah, I tried to say that in my post, but I was unclear. I like that he's being consistent with his views in this action, but find it hard to take him seriously when he holds contradicting views like what I said above.
Oh he's a nutter alright, I'm with ya. He's also a hypocrite about a ton of crap, just not on this point.

So yeah, we agree.
Post edited October 30, 2010 by orcishgamer