It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
macuahuitlgog: I wonder if they made it so the game works well on modern systems with Vista or Windows 7?
avatar
Pheace: I'd give it a few days for user experiences to gather on the forum but it even says Vista is recommended so I imagine it's supposed to be a version for the newer OS'es
Well, Rune was based on the Unreal/UT engine so I'd imagine that it wouldn't take *that* much effort to run on modern systems, would it?
avatar
jamyskis: You see, I think this is going to be a bit of an inverse problem. Steam has released a re-worked version complete with achievements, Steamworks multiplayer and so on.
I'm kind of confused - so did Human Head essentially do a remake of the game, ála MDK2HD? When someone else mentioned the addition of multiplayer I'd just assumed they put up Rune with the Halls of Valhalla expansion included.
avatar
rampancy: I'm kind of confused - so did Human Head essentially do a remake of the game, ála MDK2HD? When someone else mentioned the addition of multiplayer I'd just assumed they put up Rune with the Halls of Valhalla expansion included.
Not from what it looks like. The Unreal engine source code has been floating around for ages, there has been an open source DX9, DX10 and DX11 renderer in the wild for a while, and it's safe to assume that HH still had the source code to Rune. I don't think they've remade it per se, just patched it up for modern PCs and equipped it with Steamworks features.
AVP Classic!? are you serious DRMfree and working on modern chipsets?

who cares about multiplayer... i want my awesome vision modes!
avatar
amcdermo: It belongs here and I'd rather buy that age of game on GoG because that way I'd know it'll work on modern computers.
erm, the game works just fine on modern W7x64-based computers. the Unreal engines are amazing in terms of compatibility.
avatar
jamyskis: You see, I think this is going to be a bit of an inverse problem. Steam has released a re-worked version complete with achievements, Steamworks multiplayer and so on. I'd be worried that GOG would release a semi-functional fixed version based on the retail version that suffers from constant crashing and hardware incompatibilities.
have you actually ever tried the original on a modern system? there are no issues.
avatar
jamyskis: Not that I know if there have been tech probs with the Steam version, but rereleased on Steam until now had always been straight up releases of the original without any modification.
not entirely true. DOS games are provided with pre-configured DOSBOX. which is exactly what GOG is doing 90% of the time.
avatar
macuahuitlgog: I wonder if they made it so the game works well on modern systems with Vista or Windows 7?
why do people keep bringing this up? i can find no issues with the original.

avatar
jamyskis: Nope. Steamworks integration is - comparatively speaking in terms of the overall development process - a fairly trivial process. To the best of my knowledge devs always create a Steamworks-independent build regardless of whether they're only going to release on Steam or not, and removing it is not a problem,.just as long as the devs have retained the source code.
from what devs have been saying (the Stardock guy comes to mind) it doesn't seem to be THAT trivial. apparently, devs go SteamWorks because it saves them huge amounts of money and time since they don't have to develop and set up their own solutions (for multiplayer, patching and activation infrastructure, DLC distribution, etc.).

i'm not a dev, though, so i can't really say what's true. are you?

avatar
jamyskis: Just check out some of the Humble Bundles, which had what was previously Steam exclusives.
they've never been full SteamWorks titles, though, just like Alan Wake. with some games, SteamWorks usage is limited to trivial matters like achievements. that ought to be easy enough to remove. it gets more difficult when multiplayer and DLC are involved.

avatar
grviper: It could go the same way AvP Classic 2000 was released. Steam edition got reworked multiplayer, other versions were DRM free but the MP was cut out.
that would be pointless in this case, wouldn't it? considering Rune Classic comes with the multiplayer expansion... you'd have to cut at least a third of the game.
Post edited June 14, 2012 by Fred_DM
avatar
Starkrun: AVP Classic!? are you serious DRMfree and working on modern chipsets?

who cares about multiplayer... i want my awesome vision modes!
Its DRM-free in DotEmu. I did the whole predator campaign on a Windows 7 64-bit laptop a while ago with no problems.

Why it is not here yet is a mistery.