ShmenonPie: 1) 90% or more of handheld gaming is done in the home, which means 90% of the time battery levels mean next to nothing.
orcishgamer: Source for this statistic?
I honestly can't remember, but it's likely to that massive entertainment survey group that Joystiq is forever citing in their articles. I remember the statistic because it was interesting, though. Is it called Nielsen or something?
ShmenonPie: 4) Interesting fact - the PSP had a battery life of less than 9 hours when playing music. I know this because it was my MP3 player. Nobody complained about that.
orcishgamer: Cool I guess, did anyone use a PSP mainly for music? I mean there are much cheaper and more portable options out there...
I did. >_____> Why buy an iOverpricedThing when you have a PSP that can do it already?
It's not likely to be the norm, but still, 9 hours for music isn't bad is my point.
ShmenonPie: 5) You can bet that someone'll make an "extended life" battery for it sooner than a month after it's out. Yes, it's an additional cost, but if the thing had a longer battery life it wouldn't be at its (damn impressive) price point of $250 (or €bordering-on-ripoff, if you live in Europe).
orcishgamer: Remember, you can pick up an XBox 360 or PS3 for 250 on sale these days, 250 is a premium price and no one wants to have to shell out even more for add-ons just to make the item functional.
It's functional without them, it's just functional for longer with add-ons (which have now been announced). Yes, of course it's not ideal, but I still think it's comparatively good value for money, given the PS3 and 360 aren't portable.
ShmenonPie: The reason I have much more of a problem with the 3DS' battery life than the Vita's battery life is that the 3DS, being not that powerful, shouldn't drain battery life that fast, whereas I can see how the Vita really uses up battery life quickly. I imagine on a 3DS battery, the Vita'd last about half an hour.
orcishgamer: FWIW, I largely agree with you that the PS Vita is running a lot of hardware and that take juice. Also, I think it'll be a fun little machine. But remember, one of principal users of handhelds is kids, especially kids in the backseat that you just want to STFU so you can drive. Those kids probably didn't remember to charge it right before they left the house, and even if they did, we drive several hours oftentimes in the US. If the PS Vita can't last a standard weekend car trip parents will be rather annoyed and they're the ones buying it and paying for the games afterward (attach rate being a rather key factor in determining the success of a console). If the PS Vita doesn't cut it, they'll buy a new DVD for the in car player instead.
Well, it's not going to be ideal for all people or situations, this is true, but I think that it'll do very well for its target audience. I'd much rather it had a longer life too, but I'm just pointing out that the battery life hardly "dooms" the thing, which the thread title suggested.
In all honesty, no, the Vita probably isn't the right product for your daughter, a DS would probably be better suited as the battery lasts forever and a half, and there are tons of kid-friendly but also very good games on it, including GBA titles. I certainly don't think your daughter falls into the target demographic of the device from what you've described.
I don't want to come off sounding like a fanboy because I'm not, I was hoping for a much longer battery life, but to up and declare "oh, the thing's doomed" is silly in my opinion, and I wanted to explain why. :)