It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I'm having difficulty trying to interpret the attached equation, so I need some expert help to explain in layman's terms what the right hand side function is about. I'm really struggling with finance this semester lol. I've never quite gotten a firm grip on the summation function.
Attachments:
stats.jpg (5 Kb)
Post edited January 23, 2011 by lowyhong
This question / problem has been solved by Phc7006image
Do you have that in english?
avatar
lowyhong: I'm having difficulty trying to interpret the attached equation, so I need some expert help to explain in layman's terms what the right hand side function is about. I'm really struggling with finance this semester lol. I've never quite gotten a firm grip on the summation function.
covariance measures the strenght of the correlation between two sets of variable.

w = vector of weight of individual financial activa
r = return
i = universe of available activa
j= activa in portfolio

this formulas tells you that the risk of a portfolio ( measures as a variance) can be measured from the matrix of weighted relative correlation of returns,

that's part of the markowitz formula
I guess you already know that that sum n where i=1 means, right? Apart from that, whatever Phc7006 said.
avatar
Phc7006: covariance measures the strenght of the correlation between two sets of variable.

w = vector of weight of individual financial activa
r = return
i = universe of available activa
j= activa in portfolio

this formulas tells you that the risk of a portfolio ( measures as a variance) can be measured from the matrix of weighted relative correlation of returns,

that's part of the markowitz formula
Thanks, but my problem is figuring out why the equation looks like that. I apologize if my question wasn't clear. The summation signs are side by side - what do they mean? How would I expand out the right-hand side function if let's say n = 2?

Meanwhile I will try to look through my textbook again and see if I can make any sense of it. Thanks again phc.
Post edited January 23, 2011 by lowyhong
avatar
Phc7006: covariance measures the strenght of the correlation between two sets of variable.

w = vector of weight of individual financial activa
r = return
i = universe of available activa
j= activa in portfolio

this formulas tells you that the risk of a portfolio ( measures as a variance) can be measured from the matrix of weighted relative correlation of returns,

that's part of the markowitz formula
avatar
lowyhong: Thanks, but my problem is figuring out why the equation looks like that. I apologize if my question wasn't clear. The summation signs are side by side - what do they mean? How would I expand out the right-hand side function if let's say n = 2?

Meanwhile I will try to look through my textbook again and see if I can make any sense of it. Thanks again phc.
you can vizualize the double summation as a table. let's take a simple case where there are 2 shares in the portfolio and 2 in the universe.

so you have say a first table "i" with i=1 , w(i=1)=0.20 and i=2, w(i=2)=0.8
and a second table j with the couples (1,0.4) and (2,0.6)
and a third with the covariances with the following items

coordinate (1,1) = 0,6; (1,2) = 0,9: (2,1) =0,8 and (2,2) = 1

the risk is then a sum of 4 numbers

0,20x0,4x0,6 + 0,20x0,6x0,9 + 0,8x0,4x0,8 + 0,8x0,6x1

that is if I remember well, because that kind of formula is as you may guess never used as such ( at best, a computer does the math for you, and uses much more complex matrixes like value at risk formula )

check here too www.mtsu.edu/~jee/pdf/richardson.pdf
Post edited January 23, 2011 by Phc7006
avatar
lowyhong: Thanks, but my problem is figuring out why the equation looks like that. I apologize if my question wasn't clear. The summation signs are side by side - what do they mean? How would I expand out the right-hand side function if let's say n = 2?

Meanwhile I will try to look through my textbook again and see if I can make any sense of it. Thanks again phc.
avatar
Phc7006: you can vizualize the double summation as a table. let's take a simple case where there are 2 shares in the portfolio and 2 in the universe.

so you have say a first table "i" with i=1 , w(i=1)=0.20 and i=2, w(i=2)=0.8
and a second table j with the couples (1,0.4) and (2,0.6)
and a third with the covariances with the following items

coordinate (1,1) = 0,6; (1,2) = 0,9: (2,1) =0,8 and (2,2) = 1

the risk is then a sum of 4 numbers

0,20x0,4x0,6 + 0,20x0,6x0,9 + 0,8x0,4x0,8 + 0,8x0,6x1

that is if I remember well, because that kind of formula is as you may guess never used as such ( at best, a computer does the math for you, and uses much more complex matrixes like value at risk formula )

check here too www.mtsu.edu/~jee/pdf/richardson.pdf
That's a very clear and concise explanation, thanks a lot mate :)
avatar
Phc7006: you can vizualize the double summation as a table. let's take a simple case where there are 2 shares in the portfolio and 2 in the universe.

so you have say a first table "i" with i=1 , w(i=1)=0.20 and i=2, w(i=2)=0.8
and a second table j with the couples (1,0.4) and (2,0.6)
and a third with the covariances with the following items

coordinate (1,1) = 0,6; (1,2) = 0,9: (2,1) =0,8 and (2,2) = 1

the risk is then a sum of 4 numbers

0,20x0,4x0,6 + 0,20x0,6x0,9 + 0,8x0,4x0,8 + 0,8x0,6x1

that is if I remember well, because that kind of formula is as you may guess never used as such ( at best, a computer does the math for you, and uses much more complex matrixes like value at risk formula )

check here too www.mtsu.edu/~jee/pdf/richardson.pdf
avatar
lowyhong: That's a very clear and concise explanation, thanks a lot mate :)
You're welcome...