Posted October 19, 2011
This article also caused me to chuckle, though perhaps it's unfair or might amount to a bad editor:
http://www.npr.org/2011/10/17/141427450/herman-cains-9-9-9-plan-gets-a-closer-look?ps=cprs
To wit-
the article details how Cain's system may impact low income families disproportinately, and concludes with:
"Economists say generally people who make less money spend a larger share of their income on food and other essentials. Cain suggests that even if this is true, they can change their behavior and purchase more used items."
Does anyone else find these two sentences ridiculous paired with one another?
http://www.npr.org/2011/10/17/141427450/herman-cains-9-9-9-plan-gets-a-closer-look?ps=cprs
To wit-
the article details how Cain's system may impact low income families disproportinately, and concludes with:
"Economists say generally people who make less money spend a larger share of their income on food and other essentials. Cain suggests that even if this is true, they can change their behavior and purchase more used items."
Does anyone else find these two sentences ridiculous paired with one another?
Post edited October 19, 2011 by strixo