It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Didn't know that was going on! Thanks for sharing!
avatar
Sabin_Stargem: There are three big issues on hand: Regulatory capture, natural monopoly, and vertical integration.

Regulatory capture is when governing bodies like the Food & Drug Administration are funded or occupied by people who have a vested interest in the well-being of corporations...at the expense of the public's safety and prosperity. The current head of the FCC is Thomas Wheeler, who used to work for one of the cable companies that the FCC is supposed to regulate.

The other problem is natural monopoly. It is extremely expensive to lay down the physical infrastructure for delivering data. This means that it is a difficult, time-consuming effort that won't be easily repaid. Because there are very few companies that can do this, those companies get to determine the location and quality of service. Because there is no line-sharing allowed, these companies can monopolize a region, and charge huge prices.

With vertical integration, conglomerates like Time-Warner have begun to slow down or block services like Netflix, because Netflix is a competitor to Warner Brother's movie service. This means that you can easily access and purchase media related to Time-Warner, but companies outside of their organization would be penalized for trying to participate in the market. As a consumer, this will eventually mean that your choices will be made by Time-Warner, as you only have access to their offerings.

In short, a lack of competition, regulation, and a powerful natural monopoly will result in walled gardens. You will only be able to buy products from ONE provider, that reflects the prices and beliefs of that provider.
A lot of good points! In particular, the increasingly swift revolving door in America between high ranking corporate individuals (such as CEO's) and high level government appointments is a particularly ominous development over the past few decades (especially in related or the same fields, as you mentioned). The situation is made all the more cloudy, given that even longtime union stalwarts (supposedly the ones who want to regulate the free market the most, and decrease the influence of their strongest proponents) are increasingly more or less accepting of such appointments... Especially when those appointments are made by a Democratic Party office holder.
Post edited September 04, 2014 by StickOfPlywood
avatar
ironhide0: I'd not heard of this until I read this thread. I visited the site but I don't really understand what's going on. Are there no smaller providers such as co-ops with different policies?
Co-ops do exist in some localized places, such as Redmond, Washington, but they are usually very small in scope and limited in their ability to provide services to the general population. It doesn't help that newer, cheaper fiber optics are often still eschewed in favor of older, more expensive cable technologies, and further limited in availability by a combination of state government digging ordinances and big ISP strong-arming. It doesn't help that America's general infrastructure is aging, including cabling and wiring, and our state coffers are empty ever since we spent most of our money... in various ways, instead of making a point to use that money to rebuild and renew our infrastructure.
Post edited September 04, 2014 by StickOfPlywood
avatar
StickOfPlywood: Didn't know that was going on! Thanks for sharing!
I'd think it's a global thing, after all most of these companies operate world wide. ;-)