The Joker (The Dark Knight) - A complete psychopath who is a self-described "agent of chaos," and delights in randomly causing terror and destruction. Loves setting up "traps" of sort that set people against eac hother.

Jigsaw (Saw Series) - A man who seeks to cure others of their disregard for life by placing them in elaborate torture traps and "games." All of his traps are technically possible to escape from, but doing so often involves inflicting unthinkable mutilation on yourself or making a difficult moral choice.

Hannibal Lecter (Silence of the Lambs) - The epitome of smooth, sophisticated evil, Hannibal is easily the most straight-forward killer of the three. He simply kills people, and eats them. Also a master of getting into others' heads, he has actually been able to cause someone's death simply by talking to them.

THE VERDICT:

Jigsaw is easily the least-likely to win. Although a master of sick machines and twisted plans, his traps rely too much on stupidity and people's inability to cope with stressfull situations. Were he to put Lecter in one of his machines or "games," Lecter would simply find his way out, likely by gaining incredible insite into Jigsaw's own mental inner workings. And the Joker would simply enjoy the traps. In fact, I would imagine that Jigsaw and the Joker would be pretty fast friends.

The Joker himself would probably be pretty immune to anything either Jigsaw or Lecter could inflict on him, but he also probably wouldn't be able to dominate either of the other two like he did with the residents of Gotham City. In this case, his downfall would be his own randomness. Without a plan, there is no way he would be able to compete with Jigsaw's inhuman ability to set up complicated schemes or Lecter's impressive intelligence.

That leaves Hannibal. While his insite into human nature would probably be useless against The Joker, he's the only one who has shown the ability to succeed not only as a killer but also as a prisoner. He could easily find a way out of any of Jigsaw's traps, and the Joker's random insanity would do little to throw him off guard. Also, his comparitively straight-forward approach to killing leaves relitively little room for Jigsaw or The Joker to outsmart him.

WINNER: HANNIBAL


Anyway, that's my opinion. Who do you think would win this epic conflict?

No replys?

I am disappoint

Why don't you pick some real people like H. H. Holmes who built a deathtrap hotel and among other things directly benefited from his wife's death by selling her skeleton to a medical school? Or Albert Fish who could write a book of child-cooking recipes?

BTW, are you talking about book Lecter or movie Lecter? The plot has been erm..tweaked in transition.

umm...because that's not as fun -___-

besides which I didn't know anything about them.

Without any planning or knowing beforehand, Joker would win.

With planning, Hannibal would win.

Wow. This takes me back to my 20's when I used to read www.grudge-match.com. I did not know grudge matches were becoming popular again :D.

Joker. He would laugh at Jigsaw's traps and than kill Lecter just like that.
Lecter and Jigsaw would not stand against Joker because of their rules and logic. Joker doesn't care about so called 'winning'. To beat Joker you'd have to get rid of all your rules and boundaries (remember Joker teasing Batman to kill him?) but that would also mean you joined Joker and therefore he'd win.