I meant the implementation you smartass ;-P

Now that I think of it, you as a blue officially suggesting it as a "wishlist item" could be seen as a circumvention of ...

Wait, I have to check something ...

I think it was incitement based on 2005/60/EC or was it 2005/29/EC..... Damn I always mix that up. But there was this one case... Quite funny actually (well, not for the guy they prosecuted obviously)...

Meh, to late, I will check the database tomorrow....

nvm

Well, where do I start....

You see, under directive 2005/60/EC and act of propositioning any legal, non-legal or part-legal act as a person holding a tile of authority, quasi authority or entrusted power which relates to monetary or quasi monetary transaction without clear and obvious screening means, quite frankly, that I am simply pulling your leg.

Also:

Directive 91/308/EEC, though imposing a customer
identification obligation, contained relatively little detail
on the relevant procedures. In view of the crucial importance
of this aspect of the prevention of money laundering
and terrorist financing, it is appropriate, in
accordance with the new international standards, to
introduce more specific and detailed provisions relating
to the identification of the customer and of any beneficial
owner and the verification of their identity. To that
end a precise definition of ‘beneficial owner’ is essential.
Where the individual beneficiaries of a legal entity or
arrangement such as a foundation or trust are yet to be
determined, and it is therefore impossible to identify an
individual as the beneficial owner, it would suffice to
identify the class of persons intended to be the beneficiaries
of the foundation or trust. This requirement should
not include the identification of the individuals within
that class of persons. This is just text to distract you


Have a good night and see you tomorrow.

Also: Anyone else noticed how GOG likes to use that little red ribbon?

Ninja parties!!

I just noticed that the Continue button actually says, "Contiune".