Posted October 11, 2011

Leroux
Major Blockhead
Registered: Apr 2010
From Germany

cjrgreen
New User
Registered: Apr 2011
From United States
Posted October 11, 2011


Pax
Successful lexicographers are rare. Successful spelling reformers, even more so.
The British have Johnson's Dictionary (1755); which, while compendious and a wonderful work of philology and literature on its own, pretty much stuck to capturing then-current spelling and usage.
But Americans have long attempted to make this bastard child of a Saxon mother and a Norman father cut off hundreds of years of matted, tangled hair and present himself in an Ivy League and a three-piece suit. Fortunately, only one has had any lasting success: Noah Webster. Though Webster's politics were shamelessly chauvinistic, his "Blue-Backed Speller" and Dictionary (1825) were hugely successful and redefined written English in the US.
For that matter, Americans standardized their customary units of measure long before the British or the Continent; and when the metric system finally became attractive enough to adopt, American science, manufacturing, architecture, engineering, and surveying already had precise and entrenched systems. Only the basic sciences, which require international comprehension and do not produce interchangeable parts, have any good reason to adopt the metric system; in other endeavors, it is a stranger.
Post edited October 11, 2011 by cjrgreen

Delixe
Not Merry
Registered: Sep 2008
From Ireland
Posted October 11, 2011

Successful lexicographers are rare. Successful spelling reformers, even more so.
The British have Johnson's Dictionary (1755); which, while compendious and a wonderful work of philology and literature on its own, pretty much stuck to capturing then-current spelling and usage.
But Americans have long attempted to make this bastard child of a Saxon mother and a Norman father cut off hundreds of years of matted, tangled hair and present himself in an Ivy League and a three-piece suit. Fortunately, only one has had any lasting success: Noah Webster. Though Webster's politics were shamelessly chauvinistic, his "Blue-Backed Speller" and Dictionary (1825) were hugely successful and redefined written English in the US.
But then the English have been butchering their own language long before Dr Johnson was born. Having spent a long time in London I often catch myself saying wa'er instead of water.

cjrgreen
New User
Registered: Apr 2011
From United States
Posted October 11, 2011
Yes, but that makes the presumption that UK English is standard. There may be a standard English within the UK. That English hasn't been standard in the US for over two hundred years. I don't mean to dispute the quality of either standard of English. I just mean to point out that the US, with the intent of creating a standard suitable to the US, did create a different standard English.

Delixe
Not Merry
Registered: Sep 2008
From Ireland
Posted October 11, 2011


orcishgamer
Mad and Green
Registered: Jun 2010
From United States
Posted October 11, 2011

Successful lexicographers are rare. Successful spelling reformers, even more so.
The British have Johnson's Dictionary (1755); which, while compendious and a wonderful work of philology and literature on its own, pretty much stuck to capturing then-current spelling and usage.
But Americans have long attempted to make this bastard child of a Saxon mother and a Norman father cut off hundreds of years of matted, tangled hair and present himself in an Ivy League and a three-piece suit. Fortunately, only one has had any lasting success: Noah Webster. Though Webster's politics were shamelessly chauvinistic, his "Blue-Backed Speller" and Dictionary (1825) were hugely successful and redefined written English in the US.

But then the English have been butchering their own language long before Dr Johnson was born. Having spent a long time in London I often catch myself saying wa'er instead of water.

shantae.
Ret - 2 - Gog
Registered: Oct 2008
From Canada

Antimateria
Insert liquor
Registered: May 2011
From Finland
Posted October 12, 2011
You know.. best gamegirl is someone sweet and pretty hot who plays games.. Not just triss merigold. Also.. In my bed I have 2 brothers and I thought that I don't fit, so like a bastard I gave my place to one of my brothers.. It was his birthday. Well.. We don't are used to be good with those things but I did good. So, I don't sleep. It's morning soon.. ^^ Infact.. It's morning already. Still, I'll drink my coffee in peace.

Ebon-Hawk.689
Hero
Registered: May 2011
From Australia
Posted October 12, 2011
Ingenuity of people and their forum threads never seizes to amaze me… especially on GoG.com :)

Lionel212008
Hedonistic pig
Registered: Jan 2011
From Other
Posted October 12, 2011
So this proves my initial hypothesis that we are all closet lesbians. Also I introduced one of my 'girl friends' to prince of persia and she loved it....Think there's something wrong with her though.
Post edited October 12, 2011 by Lionel212008

Antimateria
Insert liquor
Registered: May 2011
From Finland

orcishgamer
Mad and Green
Registered: Jun 2010
From United States
Posted October 12, 2011
Actually, I see this as an argument for hormones. Remember, your gender has as much to do with whether you took a testosterone bath at the right time in the uterus as it does with your chromosomes. Men's testosterone levels drop by 30% when their wives are pregnant. Hormones control a great deal with regards to how we act. You can argue ability to reason until you're blue in the face, most people, most of the time, are ruled by hormones (present company included).

Vestin
only_droid@town
Registered: Sep 2008
From Poland

orcishgamer
Mad and Green
Registered: Jun 2010
From United States

Magnitus
Born Idealist
Registered: Mar 2011
From Canada
Posted October 12, 2011


However, to simplify everything to hormones is an equality gross oversimplification :).
I mean, if hormones were running everything, then why would we even have such a complex brain?
Hormones sure didn't help me pass my math tests at university.
Really, the answer is that human behavior is a complex thing that take into account a multitude of factors, some of which we still don't understand.
For my part, I did a specialization in Computer Sciences and Mathematics&Statistics Major.
However, I do like reading about politics, psychology and philosophy in my spare time not to mention that I did my 2 years of college in Natural Sciences (Physics, Chemistry and Biology were part of the curriculum).
Post edited October 12, 2011 by Magnitus