It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
timppu: [...], but now the forum has gone to shit with "Kill all DRM-free!!!1!" fanatics running amok.
I do not follow the forum much because I got annoyed by those guys/gals. With their near-slightness and stupidity they are ruining the world :(
http://i.imgur.com/jmK1Rf2.png
avatar
Geralt_of_Rivia: drm.info
Actually, this has just come up in conversation and the link has proven very useful. Cheers!
avatar
timppu: [...], but now the forum has gone to shit with "Kill all DRM-free!!!1!" fanatics running amok.
avatar
etb: I do not follow the forum much because I got annoyed by those guys/gals. With their near-slightness and stupidity they are ruining the world :(
Where can I find those fanatics? I haven't seen anyone like that around. I even did a search with "kill all DRM-free", got no results.
avatar
Trilarion: I usually denote DRM as: All the technical and legal implementations of the industry to keep more control over the product than is strictly necessary.

Once you got it, it's pretty simple actually.
That's my take on it.

DRM = Digital Rights Management.

Basically, it manages your rights for you (which in this context means enforcing the content providers' rights and making you don't exceed the limit of your rights).

Wouldn't be so bad if that's all it did (preventing you from giving the game to your buddy), but it has also consistently encroached on other freedoms due to technical limitations on enforceability.

And we are being frank with ourselves, many content providers aren't exactly unhappy about the side-results (ex: your DVD breaking and you having to purchase another one). Sometimes, I think the side result ends up being part of the goal for them.
Post edited September 03, 2014 by Magnitus
avatar
Magnitus: Wouldn't be so bad if that's all it did (preventing you from giving the game to your buddy), but it has also consistently encroached on other freedoms due to technical limitations on enforceability.
Actually, this was legal with the majority of licenses in the past. You had to destroy all your copies of course, but you could gift your CDs.
Post edited September 03, 2014 by etb
avatar
etb: Actually, this was legal with the majority of licenses in the past. You had to destroy all your copies of course, but you could gift your CDs.
Right you are. A caveat in my initial description is that it's legally ok to give it away or loan it if you can do so in such a way that you don't retain access while doing so.

I guess a more accurate description of the restriction would be: There must be one detainer at any given time.
Post edited September 03, 2014 by Magnitus
avatar
amok: Personally I hate with a vengeance anything that starts from calling DRM Digital Restriction Management. I am not found of restrictive DRM, and a bit holistic about non-restrictive DRM - but at least I know what it is an acronym for.
I don't like it either. Namely because it obscures the issue. DRM is about rights.

When I purchase something, I should have certain legal rights that go along with it. I can make a copy for personal use (fair use), I can resell, gift, or destroy it (first sale) and I have the right to use my purchase (property rights).

DRM therefore is anything that attempts to restricts those rights.

Personally, I think this should apply even to digital goods AND to the software who's EULA states that their software or content is licensed and not sold (in that I think you're purchasing the license in that case.)