It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Wishbone: Money, hopefully. I doubt they can sell as many copies of the oldies on Origin as they can on GOG. Different audiences, you see.
avatar
iippo: Well, you ask any economist and they will tell you monopolies rock. And you can also ask them about what they think on average about DRM: Why let GOG sell DRM-free Ultimas in bundles for 6USD when they could just force people to buy them at 6€/game on Origin?

They would certainly be selling less copies, yet making more money.
Well, that would certainly depend on how many fewer copies they'd sell, now wouldn't it?
avatar
iippo: Well, you ask any economist and they will tell you monopolies rock. And you can also ask them about what they think on average about DRM: Why let GOG sell DRM-free Ultimas in bundles for 6USD when they could just force people to buy them at 6€/game on Origin?

They would certainly be selling less copies, yet making more money.
avatar
Wishbone: Well, that would certainly depend on how many fewer copies they'd sell, now wouldn't it?
Monopoly is monopoly is monopoly.

I will be somewhat surprised if they dont do it if/when their deal with GOG expires.

Also EA wants more users for Origin -> what better way than getting even more exclusives. From money maximizing point of view it would make perfect sense to me.

Ofcourse hoping that they wont.
avatar
Fever_Discordia: Current speculation is that Steam kicked it off for selling its new DLC through an on-line store, rather than EA pulling it
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-07-27-dragon-age-2-removed-from-steam
Sounds like the way EA does things is not compatible with the way Steam wants them done so Steam shows EA the red card, not the other way around...
Ah, so that's why DA2 isn't on Steam! But yeah, I hate it that you need Bioware points to buy those DLCs. Not because of the system (although that's shitty too, just sell them for money!), but because they're never (or rarely, maybe it happened once?) discounted :( And they're doing it on purpose, too - Bought DA2 for 5€ or something, the (story) DLC would cost me around 18€ I think :/

I should really just see if I enjoy the game the way it is (yeah, I know, the hate, but I don't care) and then decide if I should get them or not. Or wait till they ditch the system. Or discount the points (as if that would ever happen xD).
Because for 18€, I can get lots of (discounted) games here or a newer game fully....
avatar
BadDecissions: As for selling the games on Origin, good. I don't approve of store-exclusivity stuff, not even for stores I like.

As for calling them "Good Old Games" ... dick move, EA.
avatar
iippo: ...and what stops EA from ditching GOG when they notice oldies sell? Thats what the did on Steam as well.
Except EA sells quite a lot of games on Steam?
avatar
iippo: ...and what stops EA from ditching GOG when they notice oldies sell? Thats what the did on Steam as well.
avatar
amok: Except EA sells quite a lot of games on Steam?
GOG and Steam are kind "bit" different size so i wouldnt go to compare them 1:1. Majority hasnt even heard about GOG yet.

Anyways, EA has quite few games that arent on Steam. Newest Crysis, newest Mass Effect, newest Dead Space, Newest Battlefields etc. I am seeing something there - but maybe i am alone mm?
Post edited July 05, 2014 by iippo
avatar
amok: Except EA sells quite a lot of games on Steam?
avatar
iippo: GOG and Steam are kind "bit" different size so i wouldnt go to compare them 1:1. Majority hasnt even heard about GOG yet.

Anyways, EA has quite few games that arent on Steam. Newest Crysis, newest Mass Effect, newest Dead Space, Newest Battlefields etc. I am seeing something there - but maybe i am alone mm?
no, but the point being is that EA did not stop selling games on Steam. Selling less, yes, but not stopped.
avatar
iippo: GOG and Steam are kind "bit" different size so i wouldnt go to compare them 1:1. Majority hasnt even heard about GOG yet.

Anyways, EA has quite few games that arent on Steam. Newest Crysis, newest Mass Effect, newest Dead Space, Newest Battlefields etc. I am seeing something there - but maybe i am alone mm?
avatar
amok: no, but the point being is that EA did not stop selling games on Steam. Selling less, yes, but not stopped.
could as well be too binding contract ;)

anyways, as i said i am hoping i am wrong.
How long does EA's contract with gog last? In case they really do start pulling games.
avatar
ggf162: 1) The later Ultima games (7-9) are actually cheaper on Origin than on GOG ($4.99 vs $5.99)
I know the last two games are crap, not sure if 7 is part of that as well. Noah Antwiler goes into detail on each game after EA got their hands on the franchise. I'm not an ultima fan, but it's a little sad seeing a long term fan just pulling his hair out talking about it. I'd only suggest getting the last few if you want to have the complete series just to have it and nothing more.
avatar
jcoa: How long does EA's contract with gog last? In case they really do start pulling games.
I wouldn't be surprised it's something like 5-10 years at a time or permanently. But overall the contract and duration has no negative effects on EA. Consider the games EA has put on GoG are likely ones they consider dead and won't support and are only putting out trying to milk for a little more money even though they consider it dead.
avatar
ggf162: 1) The later Ultima games (7-9) are actually cheaper on Origin than on GOG ($4.99 vs $5.99)
avatar
rtcvb32: I know the last two games are crap, not sure if 7 is part of that as well.
Ultima 7 is a very good game (my favourite one of the series ex æquo with 6).
Ultima 8 and 9 do not exist. Nonononope. Well, that's my story, and I'll stick to it ;) (and I will try to erase from my memory the fact that I bought 2 crappy games named "ultima 8" and ultima 9" a few years ago)
Post edited July 06, 2014 by Kardwill
avatar
ChrisSD: True but it's a bit of a dick move to call a section of their store "Good Old Games".

Though even if GOG could sue for trademark abuse of whatever it would hardly be in their long term interest to do so.
avatar
hedwards: Ah, I see your point. But, I thought that GOG had abandoned any trademarks related to Good Old Games a while ago.
This is what really confused me; sure "GoG" might have given up the trademarks to the 'name', but I think the legacy has held on for them. My first thought was that it was some sort of partnership between EA and GoG; that they (EA) was directing traffic to GoG for sales of older titles, but one click-through banished that thought.

I would certainly agree that, just for the sake of "being nice", EA could have found any other title with which to name this section of the site.



avatar
rtcvb32: I know the last two games are crap, not sure if 7 is part of that as well.
avatar
Kardwill: Ultima 7 is a very good game (my favourite one of the series ex æquo with 6).
Ultima 8 and 9 do not exist. Nonononope. Well, that's my story, and I'll stick to it ;) (and I will try to erase from my memory the fact that I bought 2 crappy games named "ultima 8" and ultima 9" a few years ago)
That sounds correct to me: there are "seven" games in the Ultima series (plus one Ultima Underworld title). U6 and U7/7:2 were the pinnacle of this series. :)

[ Eight was well-meaning, but misguided; nine was a blight on the franchise -- too much work on 3D and graphics and such; no focus on the core values of the Ultima series -- and a sorry way end things, IMO ]
Post edited July 07, 2014 by ericshead
avatar
hedwards: Ah, I see your point. But, I thought that GOG had abandoned any trademarks related to Good Old Games a while ago.
avatar
ericshead: This is what really confused me; sure "GoG" might have given up the trademarks to the 'name', but I think the legacy has held on for them. My first thought was that it was some sort of partnership between EA and GoG; that they (EA) was directing traffic to GoG for sales of older titles, but one click-through banished that thought.

I would certainly agree that, just for the sake of "being nice", EA could have found any other title with which to name this section of the site.
If GOG isn't using the trademark, then they don't have any right to it. It's really the way that copyright ought to function, but at this point, it's just trademarks that fall into the public domain when the owners stop using them.

I'm not sure how that would be nice. GOG isn't interested in being thought of as G.O.G. at this point, so any new comers are probably not going to realize what the name stood for and anybody who does know already knows what the name was.