It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I'me almost done (currently playing Dark Queen of Krynn) replaying all the Gold Box games (except Buck Rogers: Matrix Cubed, which was just too uninspired and boring) and I've also played the Baldur's Gate games and Icewind Dale several times.

The Gold Box games were the first good AD&D games, although I think there was an official AD&D game made for the old Intellivision system also.

What made the Gold Box games so good was the excellent turn based tactical combat combined with good encounter design. Not surprising maybe since SSI specialized in wargames, and this was actually why they got the licsense in the first place, in competition with bigger companies like EA.
They also had pretty good stories - none of the ultra tired "you are the only one who can save the world from the evil wizard/necomancer/demon and his hellish army by finding the four crystals/artefacts" crap. You started out with local or personal affairs.

The Infinity Games improved on all aspects of the game, except you lost some control when moving on to a real time with pause combat system, with no grid or opportunity attack rules. But encounter desing was improved (BG2 has the best encounter design of any CRPG IMO), the AI was significantly improved (and moddable) and there was just much more variety in spells, items, skills/abilities and monsters.

Of the Gold Box games the first one - Pool of Radiance - was in many ways the best designed of them, and felt most like a true table top experience. It also had the most interesting overland map, and even some chioices&consrquences since how you dealt with certain groups determined how they reacted to you when randomly encountering them later in the game.

Pool of Radiance was a bit rough around the edges, but later games improved the graphics and introduced the Fix command to quickly heal the party, and later games would remember which spells you had cast when memorizing spells.

The Gold Box games' biggest weakness to me was the piss poor AI. Especially the party AI when using Quick Combat was atrocious in all the games. Monster AI was pretty bad too, but it was improved in the last three or so games. Enemy spell casters could move and then cast, they would target their spells better, and monster wouldn't run blindly into Stinking Clouds anymore.

On the RPG Codex I've written my impressions of the two Savage Frontier games from the Gold Box series and I repeat it here:

Gateway to the Savage Frontier:

Just finished replaying this game and though I'd jot down some impressions, since I can't find much discussion on this game on the Codex or elsewhere, depsite it apparantly selling very well back in 1991.

Overall it was a decline compared to the other Gold Box games.

The main problem with the game is that the random encounters lack variety - there are usually only one type of encounter on each map or overland terrain type.
Most areas thankfully have a finite amount of random encounters. The official clue book was a nice guide in this game, and the first thing I did when entering a new area was to consult the clue book and see what it said about random encounters. On maps with a finite amount (usually about 5) I explored normally, on maps where they constantly spawn untill killing a boss I went straight for the boss, and on maps where they constantly spawn no matter what I just headed for the objective ASAP and then got out ASAP.
On the overland map traveling on roads and rivers have a much less chance of encounter than in the wilderness. In the wilderness it's a D6 chance of encounters and despite the large and attractive looking overland map there is nothing interesting whatsoever to discover. No lairs, ruins or scripted encounters; just the same encounter every 6th step or so.
On plains you encounter either Hobgoblins or Wild Boars on the road or Ankhegs if on a river, in forests Ettins or Giant Snakes, in marshes Trolls and in hills Hill Giants. IOW, not very exciting. But thankfully the tedium can be kept to a minimum by staying on roads and rivers.
So knowing this the game became more fun than a chore.

Another problem is that the game's only mildly challenging battle is the final sequence of battles, but even that can be avoided and you can win by running, or walking if invisible, from one combat map to the next untill you reach the plaza where you need to place the statues.
Hell, the game even assumes that you didn't kill Vaalgamon!
Vaalgamon is a mean mofo of a Fighter/Mage with -8 AC, 150 HP and a +5 Sword, who regenerates HP between each round. But my Hasted and Enlarged Fighter/Thief killed him with four backstabs.

I had actually hoped for a large battle in Sundabar against an army of Orcs and Trolls, but the army turned out to be just an illusion. :(
So the only battles in which I had to use buffs, potions and wands were the final three battles. First a large group of Trolls and Ettins. One well placed Stinking Cloud did wonders in this battle.
The next one was against a large group of Shambling Mounds and some mages and Zhentil commanders. A combo of Charming the Zhentil commanders, and the Wand of Deflowering Defoliation and Stinking Cloud against the Mounds (not as effective as against the Trolls and Ettins, though) did the trick here.
The Slow spell did wonders in the final battle, against the Shambing Mounds and Vaalgamon. It was the only spell that had any effect of Vaalgamon.

There was a bug with the Shambling Mounds, though. When killed they dropped som insane loot, like magic bow, Plate Mail +3, Cloak of Displacement and an Ioun Stone. The weird thing is that these items can't be found anywhere else in the game. The Shambling Mounds also had an AC of -4 while in other GB games they have AC 0.
I tried googling this but couldn't find any useful information.

The Giant Snakes were bugged to, I think. They dropped lots of Leather Armours when killed, and their attacks paralyzed instead of poisoning characters.

Another bug (I think) was with the Ascorean Mummies. If they hit you there is a chance of being infliced with Disease, which weakens you character. My Ranger, who was the only one with exceptional strength, went from 18(50) to 17 STR. No matter of Cure Disease, Dispel Magic or resting brought it back. I assumed this permanent STR loss was a bug, so I just quit and reloaded if it happened again.

Another thing that kind of worried me was that often a monster would move, but instead of attacking and getting a message that it missed the game instead made the same animation as if getting no attack due to a Slow spell.
OTOH, some "bosses" got two actions in a round, like first casting a spell and then moving and attacking.

Another possible bug was in Ascore. There is a trapped chest that my Thief had no chance of disarming, but my Paladin succeeded. And each time the disarm failed the trap would go off. Not sure it this was bug or the game trolling me.

And I was annoyed that Sweeping goblins didn't work.

The clue book doesn't mention any of these possible bugs.
I was playing DOS version 1.2 of the game, BTW. No copy protection, so I think it was a cracked version.


There were some improvements compared to the older GB games:

In battle spells effects would be shown on characters and monsters. So you could see which monsters were affected by a Slow spell, for example.

Monster AI felt slightly more random and less predictable.

The game never felt like a Monty Haul campaign and there were useful things to spend money on, like training, healing and magic items. In the Krynn games training and healing were free, for example.

When encamping the game lists all the special non-inventory items you've found.

Some events happened at special times, either a certain time after the party entering the area, or at a certain day in the week. Shops were still open in the middle of night, though.

I'm looking forward to play the sequel - Treasures of the Savage Frontier. It was the only fantasy GB game I never completed, but armed with more knowledge and a clue book it should be a less frustrating experience than the first time.


"Your post is too long".
OK, so I make a new post with the second part.
"Your post is too long".
So why the fuck does the forum software add the second post to the first one?
Post edited July 13, 2012 by PetrusOctavianus
Thanks for the very comprehensive review over a few games in the series! Certainly gives me a new perspective on how to approach the games as they are, builder on top of one another.
I have a soft spot for the GoldBox games.they basically started me on D&D and gaming in general.sure,they are very outdated but I think that the series made important changes in RPGs and gaming.
Treasures of the Savage Frontier:

Overall Treasure of the Savage Frontier was a good game.
Encounter design was significantly better than in Gateway, and only some of the later areas suffered from repeatedly having to fight the same random encounters. This game also uses the same improved AI (enemies can move and then cast spells, and they avoid Clouds) that Pools of Darkness introduced.

I also liked that in some battles it mattered which of the enemies you killed first, to get one of the three crystals you need to read the "Lucky Papers".

There was actually a few interesting locations to find in the wilderness, but overall the pretty looking overland map was rather wasted in the Savage Frontier games.

Money actually had value in this game. There were lots of stuff to buy, and unlike Pool of Radiance and Gateway, each Giant you slay don't drop 4000 coins. I got robbed of all my gems and jewels at one stage, so for a long time I actually didn't have enough money for everything I wanted to spend money on.
Conventional armour became obsolete, though. No use in a Plate Mail +2, when you get better AC, saving throws and movement with Bracers and Belts, Cloaks and Rings of Protection.

Rewards were rather disappointing. +3 Tridents and Battleaxes don't just cut it when I already have +3 one handed weapons, and +3 and +4 2H Swords. Same with +2 Helms (even if they have impressive names), when you already have looted +2 Helms from vanquished enemies.


The game introduced some new things to the Gold Box games:

1. Romances. Unlike BG2 you don't have the option of rejecting your love interest, though. But in combat one of the lovers would go berserk (or at least you temporarily lose control) if the other lover goes down.

2. Weather effects. Didn't really add much, since it just reduced movement points if it's bad weather.

3. Possible reinforcements for both sides. This I really liked. Made battles more unpredicatble.



This game also seems to have been more of an influence on the IE games than the other Gold Box games were:

1. Many named items, both weapons, armour, shields and helms. Very few of these in the previous GB games.

2. Romances.

3. Party members interjecting.

4. Farr Windward reminded me of Spellhold.




avatar
l0rdtr3k: I have a soft spot for the GoldBox games.they basically started me on D&D and gaming in general.sure,they are very outdated but I think that the series made important changes in RPGs and gaming.
They are still very playable and enjoyable.
Post edited July 15, 2012 by PetrusOctavianus
Has anyone else here played Hillsfar? Now, that was a terrible AD&D game.
D&D Online

I tried it when it came out. I don't remember much but I remember not liking it at all. I tried it again later when it became F2P and I enjoyed the low levels quite a bit, but became disenchanted when I found that most of the higher level content is behind a pay wall. Still I think that it's a pretty decent game at its core.
avatar
GoodGuyA: Thanks. Rights issues have always confused me. I don't even understand how the rights to a game can be split up among a great many companies (unless it's middleware heavy).
Often times, the rights to a piece of intellectual property that a developer has are considered just as much a valuable asset as anything else that the developer owns. When a developer or publisher goes into bankruptcy or goes into receivership, that IP could potentially wind up in the hands of a bank, or the company's debtors, even if the original company reorganized and righted itself.

Things can get even more murky when publishers/developers do things like license their IP out to another publisher/developer to make spin-offs and sequels, or ports to other platforms, or obtain licenses themselves to use movie/TV/product IP in their games.

Look up the case of System Shock 2/Looking Glass, and the Bethesda-Interplay lawsuit over the Fallout IP for the best examples of this. IIRC, Colin McCrae Rally 2005 had to be taken off GOG because of similar issues involving the expiration of the publisher's rights to use the branded cars in the game.
Wow! Some great talk going on here. Keep it up! I'm sure there are many repressed memories just dying to be spoken about these wonderful (and crappy) games!