Posted August 06, 2011

Axiom
LawfulGoodPirate
Registered: Jun 2010
From United States

wpegg
Optimus Pegg
Registered: Nov 2009
From United Kingdom
Posted August 06, 2011

I didn't make myself clear. Bethesda can drain the money out from notch and make him bankrupt with such lawsuits, and this is an actual win, not winning in court.

In the end, Bethesda and Notch will lose money.
I agree it's stupid, just please don't believe that this world isn't.

Namur
Malkavian
Registered: Oct 2008
From Portugal
Posted October 18, 2011

Jekadu
Not a lake
Registered: Jun 2009
From Sweden
Posted October 18, 2011
One of the arguments used by Notch is that Scrolls will be distributed only online.
I can imagine this will come back to haunt them eventually.
I can imagine this will come back to haunt them eventually.

lukaszthegreat
Greed is good!
Registered: Sep 2008
From Norfolk Island
Posted October 18, 2011
it would be hilarious if notch loses.
then Sega will use that case against bethesda's Rage (since they have streets of rage which is actively being sold)
and sega would definately win more money than bethsa would get from notch.
then Sega will use that case against bethesda's Rage (since they have streets of rage which is actively being sold)
and sega would definately win more money than bethsa would get from notch.

grviper
Cat Confuser Lv6
Registered: Dec 2010
From Russian Federation
Posted October 18, 2011
Maybe Bethesda is establishing a defensive precedent just for this occasion? Stupid unwillingness for Q3 or name change settlements becomes reasonable strategy if you see it like that.

Tallima
TreasureHunting!
Registered: Apr 2010
From United States
Posted October 18, 2011
In trademark law, if you don't actively defend your trademark, you lose it. This may (and probably is) just a trademark defense tactic.
For instance, when the pimp on 7th Heaven says "Oh, get a Kleenex," ABC gets a letter either saying "no no" or "see you in court" from the Kleenex peeps so that Kleenex can retain their copyright.
Maybe Elder Scrolls is being a little over-zealous because they've seen some other minor infractions and their lawyer has recommended a formal suit in order to defend the trademark from inching its way into a legally lost category.
For instance, when the pimp on 7th Heaven says "Oh, get a Kleenex," ABC gets a letter either saying "no no" or "see you in court" from the Kleenex peeps so that Kleenex can retain their copyright.
Maybe Elder Scrolls is being a little over-zealous because they've seen some other minor infractions and their lawyer has recommended a formal suit in order to defend the trademark from inching its way into a legally lost category.

Foxhack
Fuzzball
Registered: Sep 2008
From Mexico
Posted October 18, 2011

For instance, when the pimp on 7th Heaven says "Oh, get a Kleenex," ABC gets a letter either saying "no no" or "see you in court" from the Kleenex peeps so that Kleenex can retain their copyright.
Maybe Elder Scrolls is being a little over-zealous because they've seen some other minor infractions and their lawyer has recommended a formal suit in order to defend the trademark from inching its way into a legally lost category.
Plus there's cases where a copyrighted or trademarked word becomes so ingrained into popular culture, the word is used to refer to all similar items. Like Kleenex or Band-Aid.
Post edited October 18, 2011 by Foxhack

Tallima
TreasureHunting!
Registered: Apr 2010
From United States
Posted October 18, 2011
That's the problem. As soon as a court says that the brand is part of ordinary speech, they lose their trademark. Kleenex and Band-Aid spend a lot of time sending letters b/c everyone knows that they are common usage words. But they have to show due diligence in defending the copyright.

jefequeso
New User
Registered: Dec 2010
From United States
Posted October 18, 2011


It's like Capcom suing someone who uses the word "fighter" in their fighting game.

Tallima
TreasureHunting!
Registered: Apr 2010
From United States
Posted October 18, 2011

It's like Capcom suing someone who uses the word "fighter" in their fighting game.
Without protecting, you may start seeing more Scroll games. And after a while, The Elder Scrolls might not be able to hold a trademark -- or unable to protect against The Eldest of Scrolls: Skytop. Now, I doubt it'd happen, but it has before and so people often protect their trademarks on the cautionary and agressive side.
Concerning Capcom -- if they had started suing for Fighter being in other fighting game names, there may have been fewer clones or different naming schemes just to keep out of court.
It's not the friendlies tactic, but it works.
BTW, I found wikipedia had lots more to say than I ever knew: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genericized_trademark