HereForTheBeer: I don't, but here are some things to think about when picking your new high-grunt lappy:
Heretic777: Thanks for the advice. Whats the advantage of USB3 vs USB2? I'm glad you told me that USB2 will work fine in USB3, very good to know that. What brand of gaming laptop do you have?
cjrgreen: To me, they look pretty dated and real expensive. Their "Arrandale" CPUs are completely surpassed by the current "Sandy Bridge" models. ASUS has been tardy in getting the new CPUs into RoG models.
Heretic777: The new Intel and AMD advertise Turbo Boost (ie 2.0GHz but with Turbo Boost to 2.9GHz), does this mean that if a game requires 2.9GHz, the CPU will auto boost performance to the requirements? So i can safely buy a 2.9Ghz game?
Can you tell me if a i7 Quadcore 1.6Ghz is better than a 2.4Ghz Dualcore? How can you tell which is better? Does Quadcore automatically mean that its better than Dualcore?
You have to look carefully at what you're getting. Intel has two different CPU architectures both called Core i3, i5, and i7, and Turbo Boost mode performance can be illusory.
The older Nehalem architecture (mobile Nehalem processors are called "Arrandale") has 3-digit model numbers, like "Core i7 720QM". It would not be much of an exaggeration to say that most of the Nehalem quad CPUs (except the expensive 9xx XM Extreme CPUs) are really slow, and the 1.6 GHz 720QM is ridiculously slow. Avoid them. Just avoid them.
The newer Sandy Bridge architecture has 4-digit model numbers, like "Core i7 2630QM". The slowest Sandy Bridge quad core (the 2630QM) is faster than all the mobile Nehalems. Not just a little faster, a lot faster.
I would favor even the dual-core Sandy Bridge CPUs over the slow quad core Nehalems.
The other question, though, is why is Turbo Boost an illusion that is good for salesmen and lousy for consumers. Of course, the salesmen can hype Turbo Boost and say this CPU will run at 2.9 GHz. But it actually does no such thing. If you hit that CPU with a heavily threaded load (The Witcher 2 is a good example), it will busy all its cores and hyperthreads and never go into Turbo Boost.
To summarize:
If you can avoid Nehalem (3-digit model number) CPUs altogether, do so. At this point, there is no reason to buy anything less than Sandy Bridge CPUs when you want high performance.
Definitely avoid Nehalem quads. Get a faster dual Sandy Bridge (4-digit model numbers) instead. But get a quad Sandy Bridge if you can.
Don't buy into the Turbo Boost hype. The base frequency of the CPU is what you should expect it to run at, most of the time.