I don't know what to you "pointing out" means, if it has nothing to do with "saying":

Gyro: "Why do I need to have it pointed out by timppu that most of the people here do care about the drm?"

Sure, you didn't claim I "said" anything like that, keep telling yourself that.

Because you are so vigorously trying to make a point that doesn't exist, as in "I don't care whether I buy a game from Steam or GoG, but boy does it irritate me if a game costs more on GoG than on Steam.".

If it wouldn't matter in which service you get the game (with their perks and drawbacks), then obviously it wouldn't matter whether there is a price disparity between the two services.

No, it is not hilarious coming from me because I don't get similar tantrums about the subject like you do over and over again. As the quote above demonstrates yet again, it seems to be an overly touchy subject to you.

Translation: "I know I can't give any factual counterpoints, so I'll just descent to childish name-calling instead."

And unlike you keep claiming, I wasn't criticizing there giving feedback to GoG about their pricing schemes, I just commented on your illogical claim that the said people (complaining if a game costs more on GoG than Steam) wouldn't care in which service they get the game.

"Done", as in "I will continue it in bitch-about-life-in-general thread, hoping that timppu doesn't detect my random quips elsewhere."?

But I'm not yet done with this thread. I decided to get all the games in the promo last night, even though I was (somewhat) interested only to two games on it that I didn't own already, but I figured for a few bucks it is nice to have a CD-less version of some of the other games I already own...

I was ready to drop Call to Power 2, but adding it cost so little that it didn't make much sense to drop it... :)

I must say that these scalling promos are not working well for me. If it were classical 50 percent off, I would buy Call to power(which I actually wanted and would buy it for full price another time), Ceasar III(which I own on CD), SWAT 2(about which I am not sure if it will be enjoyable for me) and maybe the first of the strategy titles(which I also have on CD, but dont really play).

But seeing how small is the price drop, I bought only the game I really wanted - 8 bucks was to steep price for game I am not sure if I will even like or play, and 4 bucks each were to much for games I already own.

I my opinion this new scheme may motivate buyers who really want to test all old games or collect everything in catalogues - but it really takes motivation from me who just wants to play a game now and then and likes the lack of drm...

So its called a spread promo well so you know I very much dislike it and it upsets me with GoG.com thinking they might be getting customer unfriendly. IMO

Look this sales type is not my cup of tea either but it is hardly customer unfriendly - for instance it's better than their old tiered model sale which GOG ran. These promos, tiered and spread, just reward a different set of customers. GOG can't run 50% or more off flat sales on everything - a lot depends on the game and the publisher. This way people who like to buy a middling to complete set for the game get a better discount than would be otherwise possible - and if you've already got a game in the set, you get a better discount! That is in no way customer unfriendly. Yes flat sales with a higher base are better for the likes of me, and clearly you, who buys one or two games from a promo, but not all flat sale are 50% off - since I've been here some have been 30% or even 20% off. I really do not get the complaining about this new sales system. Why would you say this is worse than the tiered model? In many ways, this is an improved, more customer friendly version of it! It's also not like the flat rate sales are going away - they've already run one big one.