Telika: I actually believe that they have a serious, non-funny, worrying issue (the quick eroticisation of childlike figures), without being bad people themselves (they are horrified by it).
And I believe that they are just yet another breed of busybodies, who have nothing to do, so they spend time moralizing everyone else.
Seriously, after I brought myself up to speed on the subject, for me situation looks much worse and not in relation to pedophilia. I would understand concerns about children making suggestive videos and becoming targets for sexual predators in the process. But apparently the main part of videos that were taken down or demonetized were actually family videos, that had no "suggestive content", but had some nasty (or supposedly nasty) comments from (supposed) pedophiles.
It's what essentially
clarry pointed out above. There is no real connection between videos themselves and pedophile gangs, just some suspicions in the heads of (probably) the same people who invented "pizzagate". And youtube, who a few years ago decided to play censorship committee, now has to live up to own "we won't allow anything bad exist on our platform" claims. However, since youtube was never able to police own platform properly (stories about false-flagging and taking down innocent channels (and I mean really innocent, that had no controversial content whatsoever, not just some folks who were censored for political reasons) can be counted by hundreds), current measures are totally inadequate.