In addition to the post above.
To avoid those false claims because of overly idiotic heuristics, AVs usually keep very large whitelist of allowed or excluded things, to the point that those could become dangerous too.
Just imagine, your behavior and lookalike system to see bad guys is so bad, that you need a whitelist with basically billions of entries that exclude stuff from that list.
Maintaining such a list is not only a pain in the ass, it is impossible to keep in good shape to the point, that AVs even found system files of windows to be bad because heuristic told them so.
And the smaller the software is, the less AV vendors care about.
What they do care about is pretending that their system tells the truth and doesn't make mistakes to the point of nearly being scare ware.
I never heard about the heuristic actually preventing something though...
About AVG.
AVG, Avira, Norton. They are all the same, they are one company, they use one engine.
And they should be avoided at all cost.
You are good enough with the Windows Defender.
If you want a bit more but as few false positives as possible, go for Nod32/Eset.
If you want a very different approach, go for Comodo Internet Security (more for advanced users).
But leave AVG/Avira/Norton behind.