So you are trying to confuse people about the anti-left history of the Nazi party and the right-wing origins of it?

Wiki: "The majority of scholars identify Nazism in both theory and practice as a form of far-right politics..."

Are you hoping that doubling down on the word socialist will be some sort of indictment of it? You think socialism is about welfare for a 'master race'? Was there a part of the Nazi party that furthered democratic control of the means of production as they were banning unions that I am unaware of? I suppose responses like yours owe a lot to the amount of politik'in that goes into selecting history textbooks in the US these days - at least that's a generous way to understand you.

Well so far:

a) You've tried to minimize the association of untermenschen with the Nazis
b) You've ignored & distorted (repeatedly) how using such a term indebted to the Nazis might lead someone to question the fictional aspects of using a Nazi associated avatar and heading. Hell even without your avatar 'untermenschen' is a pretty strange insult to toss around as an American (especially given the events in Charlottesville recently and the rise of the alt-right).
c) You created fictional hyperbolic labels against yourself like rapist, and cannibal to side-step your own responsibility for using a Nazi epithet.
d) You weirdly try to associate Nazis with the left.
e) You ignore, obfuscate, or deny you've done any of the above.

It seems to me if you really cared about your time you would spend less of it trying to spin the reality of your words and just say what you did towards the end - take the advice of not using Nazi infused terms that would create questions in the first place. You're either too immature to own your mistakes or desperate to conceal something.

That's a question you have control over.