It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
dewtech: No

@OP

https://www.backblaze.com/blog/best-hard-drive-q4-2014/

Been using 2 Toshiba external drives for 2 years, 1 is 1TB and second is 2TB, both are still working although I transport them every day in my laptop bag and they get vibration and stuff during use, the smaller one has fallen off the table a few times aswell, still works.

Best drives are HGST, at least from my experience and the internet kinda confirms it aswell
avatar
JinKazaragi: I won't carry the HDD around, it's for my desktop PC.
The list is interesting especially since the only seagate is listed where I got a good offer and that it seems to die very fast.

I guess I'll buy the Toshiba although it seems to be quiet loud (I found complaints about that a few minutes ago).
It's still better than the HDD dying fast (Seagate 3 TB) or not working under linux/dying fast under linux (WD).

Thanks for the help.
Just saying that I havent had any problems using WD drives under UNIX-type systems. Maybe WD Greens (but those are shit anyway)? IDK Blues, Blacks and Red-s haven't shitted on me yet under Linux (CentOS, Fedora & Debian is what I use for different computers/servers)
Post edited March 04, 2016 by dewtech
avatar
JinKazaragi: I won't carry the HDD around, it's for my desktop PC.
The list is interesting especially since the only seagate is listed where I got a good offer and that it seems to die very fast.

I guess I'll buy the Toshiba although it seems to be quiet loud (I found complaints about that a few minutes ago).
It's still better than the HDD dying fast (Seagate 3 TB) or not working under linux/dying fast under linux (WD).

Thanks for the help.
avatar
dewtech: Just saying that I havent had any problems using WD drives under UNIX-type systems. Maybe WD Greens (but those are shit anyway)? IDK Blues, Blacks and Red-s haven't shitted on me yet under Linux (CentOS, Fedora & Debian is what I use for different computers/servers)
I only found an unusual amount of complaints concerning that topic, in some cases the HDD wasn't usable under linux and in other cases the HDD died extremely fast.
I'm new to Linux (Mint) so I didn't have a chance to test it myself but I didn't want to risk it.
I think all brands are equally good nowadays, regarding durability.

For performance, it's "you get what you paid for"
avatar
dewtech: Just saying that I havent had any problems using WD drives under UNIX-type systems. Maybe WD Greens (but those are shit anyway)? IDK Blues, Blacks and Red-s haven't shitted on me yet under Linux (CentOS, Fedora & Debian is what I use for different computers/servers)
avatar
JinKazaragi: I only found an unusual amount of complaints concerning that topic, in some cases the HDD wasn't usable under linux and in other cases the HDD died extremely fast.
I'm new to Linux (Mint) so I didn't have a chance to test it myself but I didn't want to risk it.
Are there really HDD's that don't function with Linux?
avatar
JinKazaragi: I only found an unusual amount of complaints concerning that topic, in some cases the HDD wasn't usable under linux and in other cases the HDD died extremely fast.
I'm new to Linux (Mint) so I didn't have a chance to test it myself but I didn't want to risk it.
avatar
omega64: Are there really HDD's that don't function with Linux?
Seems like it, I don't know why though.
avatar
JinKazaragi: Unfortunatly I don#t have much choice where to put it since it's not an external HDD.
Then I wouldn't worry about it :). You can use rubber screws or a silicon enclosure if you notice excessive vibrations, but to be honest I don't know if it's something you encounter with internal HDDs from Toshiba.

avatar
dewtech: Maybe WD Greens (but those are shit anyway)?
I have a WD Green and have been using it under Linux without issues for years. Perhaps it's only a particular model or batch with issues?

avatar
JinKazaragi: Seems like it, I don't know why though.
I don't think there are any to be honest. The only problem I can think of is with 4TB+ hard drives that have to be setup with GPT in order for their entire capacity to become available.

There is no issue in Linux with any hard drive brand in particular.
Post edited March 04, 2016 by WinterSnowfall
It's always a bit of a luck of the draw with hard-drives.

Been looking for an external one recently and went with a Toshiba Canvivo 5TB, next to my WD 1TB which had been in use just fine for years.

Went for the Toshiba based on this: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-q3-2015/ - particularly the graph down in the article (https://www.backblaze.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/blog_q3stats_manufacturer-e1444680042365.jpg) that indicates that Toshiba's Quality Control seems relatively stable compared to WD / Seagate. Not quite as failure free as Hitachi, but significantly cheaper, too.

That said there's a lot less data points about Toshiba in that failure graph.

One thing to note about the Canvivo external one is that it take a bit longer to wake up again from powered down state, compared to my WD hard drive. Doesn't bother me particularly as it really is just a backup page that's only occasionally driven.

No problem whatsoever with it under Linux Mint. And it survived a fairly long postal trip just fine, too. Sent it to an address in UK to have some data backed up on it, first, then on from there to my home address in Germany.