OK, well, I'm not really familiar with Intel that much any more since I no longer work for a company that bought me an Intel machine. According to the OpenGL vs. Mesa matrix Intel has been ahead of AMD in the feature support list for at least a year or two, although lately it's reversed again. In particular, Vulkan used to be all greens for everyone, until they added 1.1 and unofficial stuff. In other words, I didn't expect that. On the other hand, "supported" is not the same as "supported well," although I would at the very least expect bug-free support. In any case, I have, in spite of my bad experiences with AMD support, insisted on AMD/Radeon for over a decade now. Makes it really hard to find decent laptops. I also tend to forget that Intel drivers for Mesa aren't the same as AMD's drivers for Mesa, even though they share a lot of code.

Also, wine never updates its warnings of that nature. It may be wrong, depending on which version of Mesa you're using. I had to add registry entries to bypass their outdated "mesa sucks" issues in the past. That's for the cases that didn't require outright code changes.

I do have an Intel device that sort of works that I got while waiting for a replacement for my laptop, but I can't use 32-bit wine on it right now due to distro stupidity. I may end up wiping it and trying a different distro. So much for a binary distro saving me time and aggravation. Not that I was going to put more effort into that machine, since its keyboard (and sometimes even its microSD card reader, which houses /usr) has become flaky and I still haven't added support for the cameras or touchpad, although neither are particularly necessary. Having my real laptop to work on has made me lose interest.

Actually, that warning is from vulkaninfo, not wine.