Awesome game, with the features of GOG Galaxy fully supported, great!
Hopefully, we'll also be able to play here all the other Double Fine Presents games : Knights and Bikes, Kids, and the highly anticipated Ooblets!

What are you talking about? Double Fine is publishing this game and they have a dozen of games on GOG already. Are you implying this is not good? Have you even tried it?


+1! I'm pretty sure at least Knights & Bikes will get there.

I also hope they get The Cave and Custome Quest 2 on here (at least the publishing contract for The Cave has expired now).

You know there are GOGMixes, right?

Ooblets looks very colorful , if you love colorful games howt about this game i just bumped into on Steam while browsing the page

https://store.steampowered.com/app/629910/Clicker_Heroes_2/

Its flashy, colorful and clickertheclick all the way, and a little violent aswell, its in early access ofcourse, so best to wait till it gets out of it and then evaluate the game again.
Its expensive though: 24.99 ( ouch)

Because this is not a good game, is what you're saying? I don't assume you've played it?
This is easily one of the most interesting-looking and, for me, purchase-tempting new games I've seen all year, maybe more. (It's tough to get me excited about new games these days, usually one screenshot is plenty to scare me off.)

being a gag publisher doesnt exclude you from pre-moderation. For example - Crimsonland exist there for years, but none of newer 10tons titles, coz, according to them, gag isnt intrested: https://steamcommunity.com/app/790850/discussions/0/1694922526911176693/#c1694922526914927792

I didnt say anything like this.
Only called this game a "weird noname". Weird - coz its, well, weird (not in bad way. Just "weird" as "for a very niche auditory"). And "noname", cuz it doesnt look like anybody aside from VR enthusiasts or fans of this publisher knew about this title before its release.
Again - its not a bad thing to be a game "not for everyone" and invest more into gameplay, rather than PR.

But yet another time it raises question about criterias, GaG follow to accept or decline games. I used to think that they only sell commercially successfull (e.g triple A's (well, sort of) of old times, or popular indies, or famous newcomers from kickstarter) titles there. Yet from time to time store gets updated with titles like this. Not bad, but very niche without any huge success story behind.
Where is logic?

TLDR: I dont criticise this game, just raise the question regarding gag's premoderation

He says what he wrote , he's talking about that feeling, not saying the game is not a good game, otherwise he would have written the game is not a good game.

You wrote: "when gag accept some weird nonames like this, but decline really good stuff"
"but" means GNOG is "not really good stuff".

This is typically interpreted as the opposite of good.

I understand. For me it's the other way around most of the time: Since I mostly follow adventure game sites most other type of games are nonames to me. I knew of GNOG because I'm a fan of games from Double Fine (and subsequently also look at games just published by them).

Yes, GOG can be picky and often it's not really a transparent process.
When games get declined I often hear that the game developers don't really know the reason(s) why.

This is a pure word choice release.
It almost spells as GOG that's why it got released. Someone from GOG saw the game name and said, "fck it let's release it here, cause it sound like GOG".