Another Blood remaster? Why?

And for this price?

There's a reason why I set original in "" - I meant of course the remaster ... the "Fresh Supply" edition.

Looks like the people have spoken, and they're not happy.

https://www.gog.com/dreamlist/game/ferocious-2023 GOG please

They have not spoken, they have cried as expected.

My read of the situation is that:

- Clearly the release has some issues that should be sorted by now considering this is a second re-release.
- Non-owners shouldn't be able to review the games anymore.
- Dismissing the issues people have with the release are not going to help anyone.
- Atari and Warner (the publishers) should have handled this better.

While Nightdive might have made some mistakes this isn't entirely up to them, consider how Bethesda handled the Heretic + Hexen release, is clear this is more of a publisher decision than a developer one.

Better solution: People who refuse to just use the filter that will only show reviews from verified owners (a filter which has existed for years now) and keep insisting on this horseshit "solution" shouldn't be able to post in the forums anymore. : )

I'll give you that if it wasn't the review score that is displayed in the product at the very top.

And i don't think is up to you to decide who can post in the forums, so you can keep your opinion about that to yourself, thank you.

This thread really separates the free-thinkers who don't like being ripped off from the mindless slop consumers.
When Nightdive eventually starts releasing AI-upscaled garbage, we know who'll be lining up to pay full price.

I'm so agree with you !

This is the good opportunity for me to thank you for gifting me Blood : One Unit Whole Blood 11 years ago. The original with the NBlood source port is still the best version, imo.

Filters do not stop the overall score from counting non-owner scores though. On the home page, you do not even get to see the owner-only rating.

Non-owner reviews would be fine if they were ratingless.

As for the forum, it should have a "Spend 5 dollars to gain posting permission" rule, same as Steam.

I think I will skip this one and wait for "Even More Refreshed Supply" ™, the 2028 re-re-remaster.

The difference is that my "solution" was facetious. I don't believe yours was. (Also, any or all of us, including you, could keep our opinions to ourselves. But that would render comment threads like this one rather pointless, eh?)
And that's a very weak argument for restricting review privileges, given that the average score that only includes the "verified" reviews is fairly easy to spot at the top of the reviews section, always appearing no matter what filters are selected. To be blunt, anyone rash and foolish enough to buy (or not buy) a game based solely upon what's immediately visible at the top of the store page deserves what they get (or don't get).
But this entire stupid back-and-forth on this and similar topics (including pay-gating forum posting privileges -- which, for the record, I am also against) has played out dozens of times by now, in various forms, and obviously the "nobody must post reviews who I specifically don't think should be able to" crowd are not willing to be persuaded to just use the tools that GOG already provides.

The difference is that my "solution" was facetious. I don't believe yours (that I initially replied to) was. (Also, any or all of us, including you, could keep our opinions to ourselves. But that would render comment/discussion threads like this one rather pointless, eh?)
And that's a very weak argument for restricting review privileges, given that the average score that only includes the "verified" reviews is fairly easy to spot at the top of the reviews section, always appearing no matter what filters are selected. To be blunt, anyone rash and foolish enough to buy (or not buy) a game based solely upon what's immediately visible at the top of the store page deserves what they get (or don't get).
But this entire stupid back-and-forth on this and similar topics (including pay-gating forum posting privileges -- which, for the record, I am also against) has played out dozens of times by now, in various forms, and obviously the "nobody must post reviews who I specifically don't think should be able to" mob are not willing to be persuaded to just use the tools that GOG already provides.

(Sorry in advance if this winds up double-posting -- the forum ate my reply the first time around due to the good ol' "first post on a new page" [of 20 posts] bug.)

Refleshed Supply.