It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I don't know if this is just a problem with region pricing in South Africa, but the cost of the separate games for us is:
Cyberpunk: $53
Witcher 3: $15
Thronebreaker: $10
Witcher 2: $3
Witcher: $1.50
Witcher adventure game: $1.50

The total comes to $84
This bundle costs $87.77



Surely this can't be intentional? Why would I pay more money to get the bundle?
Attachments:
avatar
ColourfulMelon: I don't know if this is just a problem with region pricing in South Africa, but the cost of the separate games for us is:
Cyberpunk: $53
Witcher 3: $15
Thronebreaker: $10
Witcher 2: $3
Witcher: $1.50
Witcher adventure game: $1.50

The total comes to $84
This bundle costs $87.77

Surely this can't be intentional? Why would I pay more money to get the bundle?
It’s happened a fair bit on other bundles and specials as well, where the game looks individual were cheaper, dishonoured recently was one if I remember right.
I wouldn’t bother anyways. Witcher 1 has been given away numerous times, even though it’s the best game out of the lot and the only one I would pay for. Witcher 2 is not great. Witcher 3 is overhyped and you can likely get it dirt cheap on steam and connect it (don’t understand why they do this, but up to them). Thronebreaker I haven’t played. And WAG is a multiplayer. Cyberpunk, who knows.
Regional pricing is evil.
avatar
nightcraw1er.488: It’s happened a fair bit on other bundles and specials as well, where the game looks individual were cheaper, dishonoured recently was one if I remember right.
I wouldn’t bother anyways. Witcher 1 has been given away numerous times, even though it’s the best game out of the lot and the only one I would pay for. Witcher 2 is not great. Witcher 3 is overhyped and you can likely get it dirt cheap on steam and connect it (don’t understand why they do this, but up to them). Thronebreaker I haven’t played. And WAG is a multiplayer. Cyberpunk, who knows.
I disagree about Witcher 2. It's a great game, but the combat is awful. Witcher 3 may be overhyped, but it's really good. It keeps you hooked which not many games can, at least for me.
avatar
nightcraw1er.488: It’s happened a fair bit on other bundles and specials as well, where the game looks individual were cheaper, dishonoured recently was one if I remember right.
I wouldn’t bother anyways. Witcher 1 has been given away numerous times, even though it’s the best game out of the lot and the only one I would pay for. Witcher 2 is not great. Witcher 3 is overhyped and you can likely get it dirt cheap on steam and connect it (don’t understand why they do this, but up to them). Thronebreaker I haven’t played. And WAG is a multiplayer. Cyberpunk, who knows.
avatar
blotunga: I disagree about Witcher 2. It's a great game, but the combat is awful. Witcher 3 may be overhyped, but it's really good. It keeps you hooked which not many games can, at least for me.
TBH I brought W2 on release day, collectors box set. Never really been able to play it, until my recent supercomputer I was not even able to play it, totally under optimised. When I did finally play it I did t get far as for bored.
W3 just don’t get it. Everyone raves about fantastic open world, novel like storyline, amazing combat. When I played it (twice) I get a few hours in and frankly am bored to tears. Typical cookie cutter open world Ubisoft would be proud of. Combat is per average for the genre. And I couldn’t find a storyline.
Series really is a one hit wonder for me, Netflix series was ok, though yet to watch the last episode of two.
In a few hours you don't even scratch the surface of TW3.
avatar
blotunga: In a few hours you don't even scratch the surface of TW3.
Heck, I have probably around 20 hours or so...and I still feel like I haven't even scratched the surface of this game, so....
[shrug]