RavenCrowwise: You may make the question then: how does GOG certify the SW that they post here? I would think that the answer to that is that they ask for the source code to the developers or rights owner and they use that. Scan whatever they are given against malware, viruses and all and then they post it here. However this is another discussion.
Indeed it is another discussion, and it was going on not too long ago.
I can't remember which thread it was, but some people were claiming that what GOG does is that they just download files from abandonware sites and add to their own installers.
I'm sure you can find that discussion somehow on the forum, if you really want to read it.
sanscript: Yes, Archive.org is mostly running a fine line, and I do appreciate that they have original DOS executable for old games and extra game stuff (from old magazines f.ex)
Archive.org is actually not the best place to download old magazines. Most of the time those scans are so bad it's almost hard to read them. There are some exceptions, of course, like StarLog magazine that was uploaded by StarLog themselves.
There are some sites where people are real magazine lovers, and go to great lengths to offer best possible quality. I'm not sure if I should reveal those sites, because technically speaking they are illegal, but even at the risk of revealing one site, I must point to an article about the restoration work that they do. They in some cases spend hundreds of hours, and thousands of euros/dollars to offer those old magazines.
http://www.outofprintarchive.com/articles/features/out-of-print/the_restoration_process.html sanscript: Thinking of it - piracy isn't Archive.orgs worst offense to the human race here. They really should have more control and delete things that are utter crap. While searching for games, I found a bunch of VLOGS by empty people talking nonsense. Most had
nothing to do with games. You know, the kind that are low on intelligence and just talks rubbish just to get attention (mostly from girls - shocking!). In fact, I'm less happy with that kind of archiving abuse. Seeing how the modern age have become I'm actually not surprised...
Well, if we think that archive.org tries to archive digital culture to later generations, archiving all kind of nonsense should be on the list as well, because that is a real part of the present culture and society.
Being selective there really wouldn't give an honest picture of what the world was like around this time, when looking back from some time in the future.