Posted September 23, 2020
low rated
Sorry for the ambigous title.
I wanted to say that i hate when other gamers spoil you the plot of a game and then claim that they are allowed to because it's old.
For instance, recently i was playing a game (not on GOG) that's about half a decade old. I asked people to explain something to me about the prologue of the game, because i wasn't sure whether i had accidentally skipped a cutscene, misunderstood something, or whether the game purposefully didn't explain the thing i was confused about. I clearly stated that i want no spoilers, because i am 5 hours into the game. Then some dude proceeded to mock me and spoiled some parts of the game for me, and when i confronted him about it, he said something along the lines of 'dude, the game's been out for 5 years, do you seriously get angry when i spoil it?'
This kind of thinking absolutely baffles me. Like, right now i am reading Moby Dick (a book released before anyone alive on Earth was born) and i have no idea how it's going to end, except for the fact that the ship is going to get wrecked by a whale. Does that mean i cannot expect people not to reveal the ending to me? I mean, if i knew the plot of every famous novel, i would be a professor at a university.
Similarly, it shouldn't be expected that everyone's already played a particular game just because it has been out for long. Maybe i was in a tight financial situation then, but have got richer and i can afford to spend money on games? Maybe it wasn't my first interest and i only picked it up for a great price that couldn't be refused?
Witcher 3 is still very popular on Steam and GOG 5 years after release. I am going to bet that a major part of these people don't know the plot yet. Does it mean it should be spoilt to them? NO.
So i just wanted to say i am disappointed in many fellow gamers because of it
I wanted to say that i hate when other gamers spoil you the plot of a game and then claim that they are allowed to because it's old.
For instance, recently i was playing a game (not on GOG) that's about half a decade old. I asked people to explain something to me about the prologue of the game, because i wasn't sure whether i had accidentally skipped a cutscene, misunderstood something, or whether the game purposefully didn't explain the thing i was confused about. I clearly stated that i want no spoilers, because i am 5 hours into the game. Then some dude proceeded to mock me and spoiled some parts of the game for me, and when i confronted him about it, he said something along the lines of 'dude, the game's been out for 5 years, do you seriously get angry when i spoil it?'
This kind of thinking absolutely baffles me. Like, right now i am reading Moby Dick (a book released before anyone alive on Earth was born) and i have no idea how it's going to end, except for the fact that the ship is going to get wrecked by a whale. Does that mean i cannot expect people not to reveal the ending to me? I mean, if i knew the plot of every famous novel, i would be a professor at a university.
Similarly, it shouldn't be expected that everyone's already played a particular game just because it has been out for long. Maybe i was in a tight financial situation then, but have got richer and i can afford to spend money on games? Maybe it wasn't my first interest and i only picked it up for a great price that couldn't be refused?
Witcher 3 is still very popular on Steam and GOG 5 years after release. I am going to bet that a major part of these people don't know the plot yet. Does it mean it should be spoilt to them? NO.
So i just wanted to say i am disappointed in many fellow gamers because of it
Post edited September 23, 2020 by GeraltOfRivia_PL