Posted July 06, 2020

One of the best advantages of DOSBox, thus far, has been its consistency with a vision. Which stands the test of time.
In my experience, DOSBox is one of the most stable emulators out there because the authors take their (loong) time with things, publish a new release only when they feel it's right and don't feel the need to "modernise" anything just for the sake of it.
As a long-time DOSBox user, I don't want to support your fork at all. We have a fuckload of schisms and drama everywhere already, I don't feel the need to get another one in PC emulation as well.
Of course, everyone is free to code, use and think everything they want. That's the beauty of freedom and open source...
This 10-year old codebase is so old, that it does not work on my computers any more (it starts, but has severe bugs making games unplayable) - that's why I started work on dosbox-staging.
We (talking for all dosbox-staging maintainers here) are trying to walk fine line between fixing bugs, introducing missing features and rejecting bad ideas, that are often championed by some users; we're working hard to avoid the bloat that brought down other dosbox forks over the years.
If you have some constructive ideas about where dosbox-staging should go (or any problems with using it), I will be happy to hear about them in our issue tracker :)
You can find links to stable 0.75.0 builds here.
Links to unstable 0.76.0 alpha builds
Post edited July 06, 2020 by dreamertan