Posted May 06, 2015
I guess GOG could do with improving its exe appeal. I suggest a babe with a pair of big binaries on the front page.
Hardrada
Sanity is Crazy
Registered: Jan 2009
From New Zealand
GoodOldJim
<3
Registered: Jun 2009
From Canada
Posted May 06, 2015
And my exe!
the.kuribo
MushnutChestroom
Registered: Sep 2014
From Japan
Posted May 06, 2015
Given the timing of the Galaxy beta release, I'm going to go with... trolling. Final answer.
mrkgnao
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HCZVCTO
Registered: Apr 2009
From United States
Posted May 06, 2015
Could I interest you in a tar.gz instead?
ElTerprise
Registered: May 2011
From Germany
Posted May 06, 2015
What...why do you want to sell gamers?
timppu
Don't worry, be sorry.
Registered: Jun 2011
From Finland
Posted May 06, 2015
Executive? Execution? I can do without, thank you.
Some exercise would be good, though.
Some exercise would be good, though.
Smannesman
4-bit classic
Registered: Oct 2010
From Netherlands
Posted May 06, 2015
I agree, selling games without their executable was a bad idea from GOG.
rtcvb32
echo e.lolfiu_fefiipieue|tr valueof_pi [0-9]
Registered: Aug 2013
From United States
Posted May 07, 2015
I demand clients using .py and .ahk ! We need more diversity! Also i need a client written totally in .mov .