It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
specialdestruction: I try to buy as many games as possible on gog xD

games that are not on gog will be bought on steam

how do you handle this? then someone should renew or buy the license as it happened with other games. there is always a way... this is the purest example for videogame preservation :)
avatar
dnovraD: I see. And to whom should we pay out the 6+ digit number to? That licence alone won't get us much in terms of the games, either as the original publication rights are still owned by their respective companties.
I have a doubt, what are you exactly darvond? a disillusionist, or a mere near trolling kid? there is no thread were youa are not here to be the toxic of the month. Really mate, so much no sense cynism will be harmful for your life, believe me.
Post edited July 30, 2025 by Gudadantza
avatar
Gudadantza: I have a doubt, what are you exactly darvond? a disillusionist, or a mere near trolling kid? there is no thread were youa are not here to be the toxic of the month. Really mate, so much no sense cynism will be harmful for your life, believe me.
It's not cynicism, it's realism. Brutal honesty.
Unfiltered quantification.

It isn't just snap fingers and, tada! There's your rights issues to Black & White resolved!
If i would be the lawyer far from above i would call the situation stupid because either there is a real owner or there is no real owner. If the owning company for whatever reason does not exist anymore and no one got clear rights reserved to them, then i would hand it over to the public and the Gordian knot would be broken instantly. Instead we are going on about breaking our mind "who is owning what and who should be paid for in which quantity", it is just a hilarious situation that gets us nowhere. On any other matters, if there is no clear owner then the public is the owner and in such a term it is gonna be open source. This law situation that is unable to break existing Gordian knots gets us nowhere and need to be revised.

If a certain country is able to handle this law, not a world wide matter, because perhaps the destroyed owner of the software had its HQ at this country, then it may simply become moved to the ownership of this state. In such a case, the state can decide what to do with it, they can either make it open source or sell it to a new owner, whoever it might be.

If anyone still got some "demands" because some materials is licensed (music, assets, whatever) which is hilarious anyway because a game should be FULLY owned always and not partially owned... else we exactly get this super dumb stuff known as Gordian knots. Anyway, if it is still just partially owned because someone else may have a ownership for a tiny fraction of this game (any of its assets) then they simply have to be paid for in a appropriate manner either by the state (if they are removing any ownership left) or by the new owner. Just important to pay them not just a license but actually the full demand so the owner can have the full ownership after. It is just sad even to get into such situations because of "bad deals" they made in order to perhaps save up on money.

There are always wise solutions but someone will have to stand in for and work it out, else nothing will happen until the time may strip the ownership from anyone, although at that time the software could already be broken beyond repair because no one may have sufficiently cared for.
Post edited July 31, 2025 by Xeshra
avatar
tfishell: Do you prefer to buy as many games as possible on Steam, to keep all your games in one place? Or you don't really care about that?
avatar
specialdestruction: I try to buy as many games as possible on gog xD

games that are not on gog will be bought on steam

how do you handle this?
avatar
dudalb: So,e pof the games in the OP like NOLF are in legal limbo.
Others like the lOTR games have licence issues. The EA Middle earth games are a good example. EA no longer has the licence and can no longer sell the Battle for Middle Earth games. Same applies to DUNE games. Franchise licences chage hands all the time.
avatar
specialdestruction: then someone should renew or buy the license as it happened with other games. there is always a way... this is the purest example for videogame preservation :)
In the case of LOTRm another company bught the licence. For whatever reason, EA chose not to revew the licence.
Never forget, the game business is a business. Game comnaies are in it to make a profit. I guess EA thought that the furure sales of the LOTR games would not justify the cost of retaining the licence.
avatar
specialdestruction: I try to buy as many games as possible on gog xD

games that are not on gog will be bought on steam

how do you handle this? then someone should renew or buy the license as it happened with other games. there is always a way... this is the purest example for videogame preservation :)
avatar
dnovraD: I see. And to whom should we pay out the 6+ digit number to? That licence alone won't get us much in terms of the games, either as the original publication rights are still owned by their respective companties.
In the case of the MIddle Earth games,pretty clear that EA, when it was licence renewel time, decided future sales of LOTR games did not justify the cost of revewing the licence. EA;s whole interest was based onthe sucess of the movies, and whne the mvoies became more or less history EA felt sales would not justify the cost of licence revewel.
avatar
dnovraD: I see. And to whom should we pay out the 6+ digit number to? That licence alone won't get us much in terms of the games, either as the original publication rights are still owned by their respective companties.
avatar
Gudadantza: I have a doubt, what are you exactly darvond? a disillusionist, or a mere near trolling kid? there is no thread were youa are not here to be the toxic of the month. Really mate, so much no sense cynism will be harmful for your life, believe me.
No, he is somebody who understands how the real world works: Game companies,like every other game compnay, is in it to make a profit..and there is nothing wrong with that; if you don;t make a profit you don't last long in the real world.
Post edited August 13, 2025 by dudalb
avatar
dudalb: No, he is somebody who understands how the real world works: Game companies,like every other game compnay, is in it to make a profit..and there is nothing wrong with that; if you don;t make a profit you don't last long in the real world.
Thank you. This is part of why I think SKG is going to get raked over the coals in public discussions.