It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Antimateria: Edit1: also that flux application has been on and I came home and it's not totally bad. It's not bright but I almost see stuff.
You will come to love f.lux, and you will not notice it after a few days. It may cause people to ask you why your monitor has that orange hue though.
avatar
Antimateria: Edit1: also that flux application has been on and I came home and it's not totally bad. It's not bright but I almost see stuff.
avatar
JMich: You will come to love f.lux, and you will not notice it after a few days. It may cause people to ask you why your monitor has that orange hue though.
..and the simple answer is.. "because my eyesight yearns it" after all these years looking too bright monitor

Edit2: there is still viewing angle. I feel that monitor is a bit too tall.. I read that tilt a bit and your eyes will see everytext same if you read text from top to bottom.

Edit3: I don't even remember what gog was before grey.. Wasn't this pretty grey always.. It's pretty fucking grey. =P
Post edited November 01, 2015 by Antimateria
avatar
Antimateria: What is your test picture.. I hope it's porn.. i mean I hope that I can see many contrasts between porn. =P
Joke is a joke but I'm really asking.
Nothing that exciting, I just quickly make a picture with dark and light shades or grab a ready-made one from the web. This page was my first suitable hit with google that has a picture. EDIT: it also goes a bit deeper into things, you might find it a good read.
Post edited November 01, 2015 by Rixasha
Photography is one of my hobbies so my monitor has to be correct. Even if with no interest in photography, I don't see why someone wouldn't want their monitor to display as accurate as possible.

For starters, "dynamic contrast" should always be turned off. I also suggest reading about monitor calibration:

http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/
avatar
hedwards: That's fear mongering.
avatar
timppu: Good to know you are a licensed eye specialist so you must obviously know what you are talking about. You should go set these quacks posing as "doctors" straight then.

http://www.pecaa.com/high-energy-visible-light-potential-ocular-damage/

https://www.macular.org/ultra-violet-and-blue-light
You can find a doctor that will back any sort of claim that you want. The doctors tend to err on the side of caution in terms of what they recommend people avoid and when they're writing out orders for the insurance companies.

Do you seriously think that they know that this is the case? Computers only became common within the last 20 years, and macular degeneration is something that happens over many decades.

avatar
hedwards: It's highly unlikely that any possible damage from sitting in doors looking at a monitor is anywhere near as damaging as standing outside being exposed to UV rays.
avatar
timppu: I guess that's why eye doctors tell people to use UV-blocking sun glasses on a sunny weather. And lately, HEV-filtering glasses too. Also taking into account that people don't stare straight at the sun anyway, but stare at monitors pretty close for several hours per day.

We'll see in a few decades I guess (unless we have aggressive macular degeneration of course)...
Are you serious? The sun is many orders of magnitude more bright than a monitor is. People don't stare at them because you often times get permanent blindness withing minutes like that. Even when you don't it tends to hurt people's eyes.

Like I said, this is nothing but fear mongering. I've got incredibly sensitive eyes. I literally can't go outside most of the time without sunglasses on and looking up at the sky at all causes my eyes to burn. Being next to a halogen lamp is literally more painful than having my eyeballs scooped out with a spoon.

The fact that you're suggesting that the monitors are even remotely the same level of brightness is astonishing.

BTW, my eyes are showing absolutely no signs of degeneration. My vision is the same as it was 20 years ago with no evidence of damage. That remains the norm for most people. Once you hit a point in your early 20s your eyes don't normally degenerate much until you get old.
avatar
doady: Photography is one of my hobbies so my monitor has to be correct. Even if with no interest in photography, I don't see why someone wouldn't want their monitor to display as accurate as possible.

For starters, "dynamic contrast" should always be turned off. I also suggest reading about monitor calibration:

http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/
Normally, you want the monitor to be as accurate as possible, but closer to bed time it's often time useful to change the color as the body interprets blue light as time to be awake.
Post edited November 02, 2015 by hedwards
[double post]
Post edited November 02, 2015 by infinityeight
avatar
Antimateria: Edit1: also that flux application has been on and I came home and it's not totally bad. It's not bright but I almost see stuff.
avatar
JMich: You will come to love f.lux, and you will not notice it after a few days. It may cause people to ask you why your monitor has that orange hue though.
Agreed. F.lux is amazing. It takes a night of two to get used to, but you do get used to it.

F.lux works by removing blue tones from your screen. That causes the "brown" tones that some posters describe. Your screen will look a bit off (to others, anyway; the tones will look normal to you), but there are a lot of benefits. Blue tones are responsible for a lot of the brightness of your screen, so cutting down on the blue tones results in less glare and eye strain. This change is especially useful at night when brightness hurts the eyes more (though I use f.lux on a low setting to cancel a bit of screen brightness even during the day).

Another great benefit to reducing screen brightness/ blue tones is improved sleep. Blue tones and brightness are indicators to the body and brain that it's daytime (think the sun in the sky) and thus time to be alert and awake. That's a big reason why using electronics before bed has been shown to keep people awake. Remove a good chunk of that blueness, however, and it is much easier to fall asleep if you're using electronics close to bedtime (though I think that games are often stimulating enough that using f.lux with exciting games doesn't necessarily make it much easier to fall asleep).

The skewing of tones can be annoying for pictures, movies, and games, but f.lux can be disabled or set on movie mode to remove some of the blue tones from movies without removing so much that the movies' color looks wrong. As far as games go, I often have to decrease my usual f.lux settings for particularly dark games. It's generally impossible to find all of the necessary inventory items in adventure games set in haunted houses, for instance.
avatar
infinityeight: Another great benefit to reducing screen brightness/ blue tones is improved sleep.
My main goal in life is to sleep like a tired baby. =P

Edit: I wish I asked sooner.. I can almost feel my eyes being more relaxed.
Post edited November 02, 2015 by Antimateria