I completely agree with MaximumBunny. Very logical analysis of the current refugee problems.

Too bad big businesses support refugees and illegal immigration because they want cheap labor.

Yup, and it works both ways. For example, raping women for not dressing under sharia rules because they're intolerant of western values. It's not "we'll tolerate you while you make demands of us and don't integrate" like they're doing in Europe. They need to give up their Middle Eastern ideologies that conflict with ours. I've spoken with seemingly nice people in those countries who still have no problems with homosexuals being executed because "I hate it. It's disgusting.". This mindset is not tolerable at all and those people are not welcomed here.

I'm sure you're the expert on my life and what I understand and don't understand if you can make statements like this one with confidence.

I certainly hope it isn't. Also:

Does the studying part include the these students? http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/28/report-adult-refugees-enrolled-in-canadian-high-school-harassing-young-girls/ - As much as people try to tolerate them, they obviously need to be sent back to whatever fate their homeland has for them.

You mean these students?

Yeah, it includes them and also students like these.

When really looking into these articles it appears that these sweeping statements about (Middle-Eastern) refugees being freeloaders or savages don't hold true.

Yet you continue to make them.

You know this mindset is shared by some (more or less prominent) Americans as well, right?

Edit: Added link to Reddit topic.

But no "(more or less prominent) Americans" condone pushing them off the roofs of buildings, hanging them, or shooting them.

You forgot stoning them.

Look up statements made by American clerics and politicians like Scott Esk, Phillip Kayser, Larry Kilgore and Kevin Swanson just to name a few.

I wouldn't consider any of them "(more or less prominent)".

And people often claim that "all minds are unique" which then undermines your logic. Also, the reason the gorilla population has declined had to do with survival of the fittest. Human beings are better at adapting to various changes while gorillas are too lacking in intelligence.

Also, animals are suppose to be a means to an end. We only care about them in order to support us in terms of food, clothing material, fertilizer, or (in some strange yet highly scientific cases) medical components but of course, even when a wild animal is killed in a licensed hunt (not related to Harambe) and the meat is inspected and given to villagers, people still bitch about it even if the animal is not listed as "endangered" but rather "least concern."

The following summarizes my thought on all this gorilla-worship as well as animal-worship in a general sense...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNZ63iwnn5M

I admit I had trouble finding the right word. 'Public' perhaps is better.

I'll admit that we have our share of crazie. The difference is if they push off a roof, hang, shoot, or stone someone we don't cheer them we put them in jail.

Overall people need to remember that when the media is talking about gorillas or creating blood libel against certain groups of people like hunters (more specifically white people who go on safari hunts), there is usually another story out there they do not want you to see related to things like national debts, trade agreements (TPP with Fast Track), Islamic terrorism in Europe, Islamic terrorism in a general sense, or various scandals like the revelations from the hacked emails of the Democratic National Committee.

Last year, people cheered about the US Supreme Court decision that treats marriage licenses for gay couple like driver's licenses by making them valid in every state while ignoring how the US federal government passed the TPP with Fast Track thereby further screwing over American workers. They also bitched about the killing of the wrong lion while forgetting that lions are listed as "vulnerable" and not endangered and that the intended target was a rogue lion, one that had been exiled from its pride and tends to kill livestock and baby animals. They also ignore that normally the meat of the animal is inspected and given to villagers and that the revenues from the licenses supports anti-poaching efforts and open land preservation without starving out children in the name of "nature."

The following image kind of illustrates my point with selective outrage and covering the more important things up. It deals with CNN making the story of how Donald Trump was eating fried chicken the front and center topic and the media outlet attacking him for it while treating the story of thirty people getting slaughtered in a gas attack in the Middle East as a scroll story, the type that appears in the moving text at the bottom of the screen and is support to be reserved for smaller stories.

So what you're saying is that Gorilla Lives Matter? Wow. Racism FTW.

I'm pretty sure that rape is not tolerated on your country for whatever reason. And it appear that it is the same way in Islam. In America, everyone should submit to American law. The same goes for discriminating against homosexuals. I've even talked with people who think Muslims should all be either converted to Christianity or executed.

I do grant you that culture will be a very tough nut to crack in the short term, that is true. People do not change their culture overnight. But the Western values do include tolerance, right? Let us try to accommodate them and not discriminate against them.
By calling them freeloaders and throwing them out to die will not help cultural integration or show any good will towards them. It will only strengthen radicalism.

I did use the word suppose. But you are right, I am no expert on you and should not assume much based on what you say. I would expect more compassion from you if you had struggled for your survival at some point.

I am sure, however, that you are not the expert on the lives of Eastern refugees, and what they understand and don't understand, if you can make statements like calling them "a bunch of uncivilized barbarian migrants that only cause trouble in any country they inhabit" and "Of course their deaths aren't important. Several people were spared from being attacked, murdered, robbed, raped, etc." with confidence.

I think that America has worse problems. If money is the problem, maybe fixing tax loopholes would help.

The thing is that both facts are true. That there are Syrian refugees that want peace and better lives, and that there are savage freeloaders causing problems. This is why both the "throw them out to fend for themselves" and "take them all in mindlessly and hope it works out" options don't work. We need a limbo to keep them in, some type of neutral zone.

Airplanes and boats go both ways. What can be brought in can be shipped out.