It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
mrkgnao: No. It's not possible. And it's not a question of filters; it's simply that the data is not there. MaGog does not keep a history of regional prices, only of the base price.

P.S. If you have a specific question, it might be possible to answer it by writing a program that scans MaGog's historical logs (the ones she generates on her update runs, every six hours). I keep them all (currently upwards of 21 GB of text), just in case. [...]
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Fist off, sorry for the very belated reply.

Thanks for the offer, but my interest is more about being able to look up when and how things change.
Curious, since you keep all of her historical logs (i.e. the data I'd like to see are stored albeit in a non directly usable form), may I ask why they're not made available for look ups through additional/special filters?
Several reasons:
1. MaGog's server's disk space is limited. I can only keep the last 1-2 GB of logs there. Every few months, I download past logs to my home PC and delete them from the server. So when I say I have all historical logs, I mean on my home PC, not online.
2. Even if the logs were available online, they were designed to allow me to quickly browse them every six hours in order to detect GOG changes and to debug potential GOG and MaGog bugs. They were not designed for querying. Writing even one filter for querying the logs for my own use would be quite a task. Having a general purpose publicly available search engine for the logs would be a monumental endeavour.
3. Even if there were such filters, running them would probably takes many minutes, if not hours, per query, instead of the current 1-2 seconds when querying the database, making them much less user friendly.

avatar
mrkgnao: [...] P.P.S. BTW, the case you point to in the link above is not one of changing from flat to regional. It's from regional in a few countries to regional in a lot of countries. Ubisoft games have been regional for years now.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: I'm aware that Ubisoft release all their games regionally priced post the introduction of regional pricing here. The reason I mentioned it is that I recall their early catalogue (i.e. released before mid 2014) being flat priced (or at least with only discounted prices for the usual regions?) until recently.
You might be right. I don't remember. Unlike others, I don't differentiate between "regional priced where everyone pays less or the same as US" and "regional priced where some pay more than US". I don't think of one as better than the other. They're both equally regionally priced in my opinion.
avatar
mrkgnao: Several reasons:
1. MaGog's server's disk space is limited. I can only keep the last 1-2 GB of logs there. Every few months, I download past logs to my home PC and delete them from the server. So when I say I have all historical logs, I mean on my home PC, not online.
2. Even if the logs were available online, they were designed to allow me to quickly browse them every six hours in order to detect GOG changes and to debug potential GOG and MaGog bugs. They were not designed for querying. Writing even one filter for querying the logs for my own use would be quite a task. Having a general purpose publicly available search engine for the logs would be a monumental endeavour.
3. Even if there were such filters, running them would probably takes many minutes, if not hours, per query, instead of the current 1-2 seconds when querying the database, making them much less user friendly. [...]
Cheers, I assumed it must be a complicated matter.

But I think I didn't make myself very clear - when I spoke of additional/special filters, I didn't mean querying the logs themselves. I was thinking along the line of having the relevant logs data in a separate database (without them being permanently listed with the rest of the info per game) that could be queried using said filters. From everything you said, however, the work required isn't worth the odd query occasionally performed by a couple of users.


avatar
mrkgnao: [...] You might be right. I don't remember. Unlike others, I don't differentiate between "regional priced where everyone pays less or the same as US" and "regional priced where some pay more than US". I don't think of one as better than the other. They're both equally regionally priced in my opinion.
The reason I remember is because I've got my currency set to USD, so it's easy to spot a deviation from the US (base) price, especially when I was getting the US price, without having to consult the "Good News: Price Updates" thread, not because I consider one as better than the other; the reasons given for each type of regional pricing, and the way they're applied, is arbitrary, no matter how one looks at it.