Posted September 08, 2020
Not going to quote everything.
Video is objectively inferior unless you are bringing something to the table which can only be done there. And like I said, there are three good reasons not to watch a video on Youtube. Also, I read the title and your posts. There was enough of a basis there to write something.
So, because most people didn't bother addressing you or the thread at hand means it's not frowned upon? Considering that you registered in 2009, and I assume you have been in forums beforehand, you should know better. Granted, GOG's forum is really bad but that shouldn't change anything.
Youtube has a character limit? I'm talking about the thread title. Let me see, your thread title is:
"How Recettear changed PC Gaming Forever" followed by things such as:
"I have a small YouTube channel dedicated to gaming and retro gaming and today I decided to talk about an event in PC gaming that I feel most people don't realize: That 2010's Recettear actually changed PC gaming." <-- no mentioned of (JRPG) PC gaming in the West
"In the video, I make the argument this was the game that brought the JRPG genre to PC." <-- again no mention of PC gaming in the West
"It doesn't change the fact Japan ignored the platform as a whole and Recettear was the game that changed all that.
Compare the JRPG offerings on PC before and after Recettear, the difference is night and day.
Honestly, the fact you have to RPG maker games as example of JRPGs on PC before recettear kind of makes my point for me. " <--- no mention of PC gaming in the West either
"Recettear was a commercial and critical success. It was the game that brought the genre to PC. Even XSeed admitted Recettear was the reason they started bringing games to PC." <-- no mention of PC gaming in the West
None of those sentences was addressed at me but you still conveniently left it out (likely to make it sound stronger). There is not a single sentence where you write the full truth. After all, it sounds less lurid otherwise and has a lot less of a point.
Oh? Posting that was so hard? Something like that should have belonged in the OP. I mean, first of all, I wouldn't have been interested, as JRPGs released on Western PCs is very limited and as such, uninteresting, especially because it draws an arbitrary line. Add to that that gamers didn't have to "wait" for two years. They could have just imported the titles themselves or bought it from reporters. It was common for console games and it was available for PC games.
You could have just addressed the very first thing I wrote in this thread: "Are you talking about Western releases exclusively?" Instead, you ignored it while writing in a way that says that you are talking about JRPGs on PCs in general on every single occasion.
Fair enough, I didn't re-read the posts that came before my first one (it was really late and I wanted to go to bed) and had already blanked them out as not important or giving information (the point addressing you about Dragon Knight III aside).
User score really doesn't matter. People get downvoted by bots, so whether he has 50000 or -180 points is a moot point when it comes to arguments.
Like I said, you didn't need to reiterate. You would have had to write like three whole points. Done in a minute. Also, like I said several times already: I addressed your posts in the thread, not what you said in the video. If you can't articulate properly in writing, it's your fault, not mine.
If you believe that you never addressing any of my points where I call out your writing in this thread while you are going just: "Nana, not telling you, watch the video" is humiliating myself, you have a very weird interpretation of that.
Video is objectively inferior unless you are bringing something to the table which can only be done there. And like I said, there are three good reasons not to watch a video on Youtube. Also, I read the title and your posts. There was enough of a basis there to write something.
So, because most people didn't bother addressing you or the thread at hand means it's not frowned upon? Considering that you registered in 2009, and I assume you have been in forums beforehand, you should know better. Granted, GOG's forum is really bad but that shouldn't change anything.
Youtube has a character limit? I'm talking about the thread title. Let me see, your thread title is:
"How Recettear changed PC Gaming Forever" followed by things such as:
"I have a small YouTube channel dedicated to gaming and retro gaming and today I decided to talk about an event in PC gaming that I feel most people don't realize: That 2010's Recettear actually changed PC gaming." <-- no mentioned of (JRPG) PC gaming in the West
"In the video, I make the argument this was the game that brought the JRPG genre to PC." <-- again no mention of PC gaming in the West
"It doesn't change the fact Japan ignored the platform as a whole and Recettear was the game that changed all that.
Compare the JRPG offerings on PC before and after Recettear, the difference is night and day.
Honestly, the fact you have to RPG maker games as example of JRPGs on PC before recettear kind of makes my point for me. " <--- no mention of PC gaming in the West either
"Recettear was a commercial and critical success. It was the game that brought the genre to PC. Even XSeed admitted Recettear was the reason they started bringing games to PC." <-- no mention of PC gaming in the West
None of those sentences was addressed at me but you still conveniently left it out (likely to make it sound stronger). There is not a single sentence where you write the full truth. After all, it sounds less lurid otherwise and has a lot less of a point.
Oh? Posting that was so hard? Something like that should have belonged in the OP. I mean, first of all, I wouldn't have been interested, as JRPGs released on Western PCs is very limited and as such, uninteresting, especially because it draws an arbitrary line. Add to that that gamers didn't have to "wait" for two years. They could have just imported the titles themselves or bought it from reporters. It was common for console games and it was available for PC games.
You could have just addressed the very first thing I wrote in this thread: "Are you talking about Western releases exclusively?" Instead, you ignored it while writing in a way that says that you are talking about JRPGs on PCs in general on every single occasion.
Fair enough, I didn't re-read the posts that came before my first one (it was really late and I wanted to go to bed) and had already blanked them out as not important or giving information (the point addressing you about Dragon Knight III aside).
User score really doesn't matter. People get downvoted by bots, so whether he has 50000 or -180 points is a moot point when it comes to arguments.
Like I said, you didn't need to reiterate. You would have had to write like three whole points. Done in a minute. Also, like I said several times already: I addressed your posts in the thread, not what you said in the video. If you can't articulate properly in writing, it's your fault, not mine.
If you believe that you never addressing any of my points where I call out your writing in this thread while you are going just: "Nana, not telling you, watch the video" is humiliating myself, you have a very weird interpretation of that.