It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
what will you be your choice between these two technologies? and why would you choose one instead of other?

or the third choice: do you plan keeping the old v-sync monitor instead?

i choosed the third option because my dream monitor would be 4k 144hz ips 1ms with g-sync display port driver support (hope in the meantime nvidia will go the driver route support like amd instead of build in chip of the monitor)

ohh and maybe the 4k will be a hell lot cheaper by that time!
Post edited July 29, 2015 by AlexZeusMercer
Don't remind me... I'm still pissed that Asus & Nvidia doesn't want to support G-Sync on my G751jy despite of proof that it is clearly working with the leaked alpha driver.
avatar
blotunga: Don't remind me... I'm still pissed that Asus & Nvidia doesn't want to support G-Sync on my G751jy despite of proof that it is clearly working with the leaked alpha driver.
if it was leaked maybe they will release the driver in the near future
you can still try that alpha driver ;) google is your friend look for it !
avatar
AlexZeusMercer: if it was leaked maybe they will release the driver in the near future
you can still try that alpha driver ;) google is your friend look for it !
Yes, I know, but with that driver The Witcher 3 doesn't works as well as it does with the latest driver. And apparently Nvidia wants more money so they won't let Asus support GSync on the non-Gsync labeled laptops.
Post edited July 29, 2015 by blotunga
I am not up to date on the two techs and their developments, but...

Ultimately, I'll pick the one that comes closest to satisfying cross-platform support and open source.
As far as I'm aware, that puts FreeSync in the clear lead.

Plus, I'm wary of Nvidia and their practices over the years (Physx, Hairworks, etc.)
avatar
Phaedrus567: ...pick the one that comes closest to satisfying cross-platform support and open source.
As far as I'm aware, that puts FreeSync in the clear lead...
I'd agree with that, unfortunately from what I read, FreeSync doesn't really work all that well, while G-sync works.
Post edited July 29, 2015 by MadalinStroe
'N Sync
Neither. So much trouble and so much money for something that's just not that big of a deal for your enjoyment of games. If you really hate screen tearing, enabling Vsync eliminates it 100%. And if you can live with screen tearing, then you don't need to do anything. The minor benefit isn't really something life-changing, unless you managed to convince yourself that it is. The vast vast majority of gamers don't care about any of this, and this will remain reserved for tech fanatics with a lot of disposable income.
Post edited July 29, 2015 by TDP
avatar
stg83: 'N Sync
Backstreet's back! Alright!

....sorry, what were we talking about?
Post edited July 29, 2015 by Phaedrus567
avatar
Phaedrus567: ...pick the one that comes closest to satisfying cross-platform support and open source.
As far as I'm aware, that puts FreeSync in the clear lead...
avatar
MadalinStroe: I'd agree with that, unfortunately from what I , FreeSync doesn't really work all that well, while G-sync works. <a href="http://www.gog.com/forum/general/gsync_or_freesync/post6" class="link_arrow"></a></div> I'm just skimming more recent reviews because I'm running out of time, but I [url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/9097/the-amd-freesync-review/5]thought this was interesting:

" .... G-SYNC handles dropping below the minimum FPS more gracefully than FreeSync, though if you're routinely falling below the minimum FreeSync refresh rate we'd argue that you should lower the settings. Mostly what you get with FreeSync/G-SYNC is the ability to have smooth gaming at 40-60 FPS and not just 60+ FPS.

Other sites are reporting ghosting on FreeSync displays, but that's not inherent to the technology. Rather, it's a display specific problem (just as the amount of ghosting on normal LCDs is display specific). Using higher quality panels and hardware designed to reduce/eliminate ghosting is the solution. The FreeSync displays so far appear to not have the same level of anti-ghosting as the currently available G-SYNC panels, which is unfortunate if true. (Note that we've only looked at the LG 34UM67, so we can't report on all the FreeSync displays.) Again, ghosting shouldn't be a FreeSync issue so much as a panel/scaler/firmware problem, so we'll hold off on further commentary until we get to the monitor reviews.

One final topic to address is something that has become more noticeable to me over the past few months. While G-SYNC/FreeSync can make a big difference when frame rates are in the 40~75 FPS range, as you go beyond that point the benefits are a lot less clear. Take the 144Hz ASUS ROG Swift as an example. Even with G-SYNC disabled, the 144Hz refresh rate makes tearing rather difficult to spot, at least in my experience. Considering pixel response times for LCDs are not instantaneous and combine that with the way our human eyes and brain process the world and for all the hype I still think having high refresh rates with VSYNC disabled gets you 98% of the way to the goal of smooth gaming with no noticeable visual artifacts (at least for those of us without superhuman eyesight)."

Emphasis in bold are mine.
Post edited July 29, 2015 by Phaedrus567