It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
kai2: -snip-
Museums are also typically given grants, bonds, and other means of funding as part of arts initiatives. Most computer museums are tiny little places, with mostly display models instead of functional machines. It'd be like running a MRI museum.

I have a bunch of functionally obsolete, incredibly heavy, mechanically complicated machines that no longer have any support from vendors, and if one of them broke, it'd be such a pain to get them fixed due to the last engineer for one having retired some odd 10 years ago.

I know that Poland formerly granted CDPR some lets for their projects for that good ole' misplaced nationalistic pride, but I do not know if that is currently applicable, or if any of it even went to GOG in the first place.
avatar
kai2: A museum can ask for funding because the museum itself is the reward, but a for-profit entity needs to be providing something in return for money.
A museum is still asking for a entrance-fee... usually they do not offer their service for free. So, in fact they got a "commercial" and a non commercial income. Some companies even are getting sponsored by the state, yet they still demand money for their services. They basically are a private company partially funded by "state funds"... and this is not even a rarity, happens a lot. Guess they call it "regulations" or "to important to fail".

It all depend on if a society or state is putting sufficient value into it, in the end, not what it is or how it is actually being funded.

Are they profit oriented? Well, even the museum would probably "keep their money" if they could but in usual given the high maintenance costs, it is non profit and may need state-funds. In the way our system works, a lot of stuff is not actually able to be sustainable, so this stuff is usually funded by different means. Yet, if the society or state is considering it "not that important" they may just wipe it and it will be gone. We live in a system of success and those with the highest success and support kinda are able to "rule the world".

Ultimately, nope... the reality and truth is way more complicated and does not work in a clear and precise manner. In the end all what matters is simply "do we want it"... the humans in usual are the deciding factor if something it still able to exist or perhaps... they can go play Fornite until their very last days, if they find it more valuable.

Money itself is not a complicated thing if its basic is being understood. Its basic is power, nothing else... and anyone asking for money need to "master the art of giving it power"... then it may be granted, not any sooner than that.

Oh and there are 2 ways of "non profit" a absolute term "de jure" and a relative term "de facto", in a relative term GOG is currently non profit but this is not a absolute term, which means... "they are open for profit".

Yeah its complicated at times and many people kinda are taking the "way to short route" into trying to understand things which in fact are full of "exceptions" and "extensions".
Post edited September 16, 2025 by Xeshra
avatar
Xeshra: There is zero evidence that GOG is "profiting a lot".
I was talking about those making the most remasters and remakes, not gog.
Remasters and Remake? No clue. Please be more precise.

Your opinion is that GOG is not "giving enough of value" for what they take. Okay, it is valid having such a opinion but in my mind, even if they give to less... fact is they are as well taking or getting to less. I was already explaining my view on this matter.
avatar
Xeshra: Remasters and Remake? No clue. Please be more precise.
Those who do game preservation for the love of gaming and helping their fellow gamer often make a better product than those who do so for money. Hope this helps because I don't think I can make it any simpler.
Post edited September 17, 2025 by ChuckysGhost
My view is that both was contributing a lot and it was a good thing releasing many mods on GOG because this is merging this "hand in hand" force even more; modders and the industry. I do not see it as some completely separated thing, we all are playing a important role in preservation, every modder, every gamer and as well the industry as a whole including GOG. I rather see it as "teamwork" not "who is doing the better job".

Obviously if someone is doing it commercially... they need payment. Modders may ask for donation-related-payment (some of them even are demanding it) but they usually got another income... as good as always, as it is not a commercial thing to them.