It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
avatar
ChrisG_: Funny that, i have never made an excuse for it but i would not fool myself preaching about ethics either when i know that pretty much every larger business would sell their soul to do business in China if they aren't even doing it yet.

As i said it's about one thing and one thing only: money.
avatar
Time4Tea: You seem to be arguing that we should not hold businesses to any sort of ethical standards. Businesses should be above accountability for their actions and, as long as they are making money, then anything goes and we should turn a blind eye to their ethical misconduct, because "other companies are doing it anyway".

Yes, businesses make money, but they can (and should) still be expected to maintain certain standards of ethical behavior. After all, GOG.com is a business that has built its reputation based on the ethical principle of opposing DRM. If anything goes in the pursuit of profit, then they may as well open the doors to DRM as well then. After all, it would make a lot more money, right?

avatar
ChrisG_: There is also a reason why Steam, Epic, Origin, Uplay etc don't sell Devotion and i don't see Zoom selling it either for all the speculation that they would, they only avoided the mistake of announcing it in the first place but then i don't see them ever making games that would ever sell in China so it's not like they have much to lose anyway.
avatar
Time4Tea: I already don't buy from Steam, Epic, Origin, because they sell DRMed games, so I don't care what goes on there. Zoom Platform have said openly that they are willing to sell Devotion on their store and they have spoken with Red Candle; however, in the wake of the issues with GOG, apparently RC have already made a decision to sell their games on their own site and not via a third-party store. Is it their fault if GOG has already burnt the ground there?

avatar
ChrisG_: I don't like the chinese government like everyone else but i will not going around telling other people what to do and if people don't like a company bending to certain markets which is understanding in this case then please also don't buy goods manufactured in China, apply your ethics to everything China.
avatar
Time4Tea: Another version of the nonsensical argument that "we shouldn't protest against anything, unless we simultaneously protest against everything." That is utter nonsense and going by that logic the protests that led to such things as women's votes and civil rights in the US would never have happened. No. We need to pick our battles and push back against what we can, when we can. I have been a customer of GOG.com and boycotting them is a small thing that I can do right now to push back against insidious censorship.
No you are making up bullshit, i said several times you should protest if it's against what you believe in but don't put yourself up as a preacher everywhere you go, People can make their own desicions and we can disagree with them. There is a difference between boycotting and putting yourself on a high horse while making your ethical struggle a public battle.

If you disagree how they are conducting their business it's your right to not support it, i simply said that larger companies opposed to smaller always go where the money is over principles for many factors like investors, staff growth etc and you can see this trend over and over, do you disagree ?

I have never said we shouldn't do anything or making excuses for it, i disagree how it was handled but that doesn't mean you can't make observations about how businesses works, is it right that money goes before ethics ? no but it is whether you want it or not how most larger business conduct themselves.

The moral argument however injected into every message is lazy while completely ignoring why things are as they are.
Post edited August 16, 2021 by ChrisG_
low rated
avatar
Time4Tea: I also try to avoid buying Chinese goods where possible, because they have a terrible record on human rights and freedom of speech and are simply becoming too powerful and dominant. However, in the US it is almost impossible to completely avoid Chinese-made products, partly because in some cases there are no alternatives and partly because the information about product sourcing is not always provided.

However, it's not the fault of consumers like us, if we are not being given a real choice. All we can do is to do our best and to push back whenever and wherever we can.
Well said

-

avatar
ChrisG_: i said several times you should protest if it's against what you believe in but don't put yourself up as a preacher everywhere you go, People can make their own desicions and we can disagree with them. There is a difference between boycotting and putting yourself on a high horse while making your ethical struggle a public battle.
I say if people want to "preach" on some important issues(in this case, things related to GOG), then by all means....it harms no one(people can choose not to read it, even, if they so choose), and to me it's much better than saying "that's just how it is" while shrugging one's shoulders and doing little else.
Post edited August 16, 2021 by GamezRanker
low rated
avatar
Time4Tea: I also try to avoid buying Chinese goods where possible, because they have a terrible record on human rights and freedom of speech and are simply becoming too powerful and dominant. However, in the US it is almost impossible to completely avoid Chinese-made products, partly because in some cases there are no alternatives and partly because the information about product sourcing is not always provided.

However, it's not the fault of consumers like us, if we are not being given a real choice. All we can do is to do our best and to push back whenever and wherever we can.
avatar
GamezRanker: Well said

-

avatar
ChrisG_: i said several times you should protest if it's against what you believe in but don't put yourself up as a preacher everywhere you go, People can make their own desicions and we can disagree with them. There is a difference between boycotting and putting yourself on a high horse while making your ethical struggle a public battle.
avatar
GamezRanker: I say if people want to "preach" on some important issues, then by all means....it harms no one(people can choose not to read it, even, if they so choose), and to me it's much better than saying "that's just how it is" while shrugging one's shoulders and doing little else.
Saying that it is how it is doesn't mean you can't do anything about it because it is literally HOW IT WORKS that money goes before ethics in general just look at the world, the only difference is not everyone is grandstanding in public and letting everyone know how good and ethical they are.

You can do it however you want, it's a free world and no one will stop you but all these replies doesn't even address the point, all it is now is an debate about ethics.
Post edited August 16, 2021 by ChrisG_
low rated
avatar
ChrisG_: Saying that it is how it is doesn't mean you can't do anything about it because it is literally HOW IT WORKS that money goes before ethics in general just look at the world, the only difference is not everyone is grandstanding in public and letting everyone know how good and ethical they are.
No that's not "how it works", that's "how it often IS".....there's a difference. Also, it doesn't have to be that way: we're not robots.....people/companies can choose to do things one way or another.

Btw: you know what else used to be "how it is"? Things like no worker safety regulations, forced labor, etc. Should people have just shrugged and said "that's how it is" back then as well?

As for the "grandstanding": it doesn't bother me, and tbth I wish more people would do such things. If it bothers you so much, might I suggest not reading it(and perhaps you might want to introspect on why it bothers you as well)?
Post edited August 16, 2021 by GamezRanker
low rated
avatar
ChrisG_: Saying that it is how it is doesn't mean you can't do anything about it because it is literally HOW IT WORKS that money goes before ethics in general just look at the world, the only difference is not everyone is grandstanding in public and letting everyone know how good and ethical they are.
avatar
GamezRanker: No that's not "how it works", that's "how it often IS".....there's a difference. Also, it doesn't have to be that way: we're not robots.....people/companies can choose to do things one way or another.

Btw: you know what else used to be "how it is"? Things like no worker safety regulations, forced labor, etc. Should people have just shrugged and said "that's how it is" back then as well?

As for the "grandstanding": it doesn't bother me, and tbth I wish more people would do such things. If it bothers you so much, might I suggest not reading it?
Grandstanding doesn't bother me and can easily look away but perhaps remember it was you people who replied to me not me to you and then ethics came into the discussion so stop projecting what you think i "might" have a problem with to me !

Things change and maybe things will change again eventually from how they currently are sooner or later and it seems i have to say this for the hundreth time, you should work for change if you don't like how it is and this is what i have said all along.

Since you fixate on this line "how it is" ! it does not mean DON'T do anything about it but it is common knowledge that companies goes where the money is and that is how it is, if you don't like it then people need to engage themselves for change preferably not on a gaming forum though.
Post edited August 16, 2021 by ChrisG_
low rated
avatar
ChrisG_: Grandstanding doesn't bother me and can easily look away but perhaps remember it was you people who replied to me not me to you and then ethics came into the discussion so stop projecting what you think i "might" have a problem with to me !

...but it is common knowledge that companies goes where the money is and that is how it is, if you don't like it then people need to engage themselves for change preferably not on a gaming forum though.
Ok, Mr Hornsby

====

Next up on the top 10: what GOG possibly might've been thinking when they chose not sell Devotion
Post edited August 16, 2021 by GamezRanker
low rated
avatar
ChrisG_: No you are making up bullshit, i said several times you should protest if it's against what you believe in but don't put yourself up as a preacher everywhere you go, People can make their own desicions and we can disagree with them. There is a difference between boycotting and putting yourself on a high horse while making your ethical struggle a public battle.

If you disagree how they are conducting their business it's your right to not support it, i simply said that larger companies opposed to smaller always go where the money is over principles for many factors like investors, staff growth etc and you can see this trend over and over, do you disagree ?

I have never said we shouldn't do anything or making excuses for it, i disagree how it was handled but that doesn't mean you can't make observations about how businesses works, is it right that money goes before ethics ? no but it is whether you want it or not how most larger business conduct themselves.

The moral argument however injected into every message is lazy while completely ignoring why things are as they are.
So it seems that our main disagreement then is that you object to the concept of public protest? You want public protests about moral issues to be silenced and suppressed, because it is inconvenient for you to have to hear them/read them?

There is a good reason why people protest issues in public - to draw attention to their causes and reach out to others who may feel a similar way. To go back to my earlier example, would the protests in favor of women's voting rights have been successful, if those supporting it had simply stayed at home and stayed quiet? Would any of the successful consumer boycotts listed here have been successful, if they hadn't been publicized?

You don't have to agree with the boycott or join it, that's fine. You're entitled to your opinion and to disagree, of course. But please don't try to silence us or suggest that we shouldn't be making our protest in public. As far as I am concerned, that is effectively an attack the principles of free speech and free protest.

You don't like the boycott? Don't agree with the protest? Ignore it and walk away then. Simple.
Post edited August 16, 2021 by Time4Tea
low rated
avatar
ChrisG_: No you are making up bullshit, i said several times you should protest if it's against what you believe in but don't put yourself up as a preacher everywhere you go, People can make their own desicions and we can disagree with them. There is a difference between boycotting and putting yourself on a high horse while making your ethical struggle a public battle.

If you disagree how they are conducting their business it's your right to not support it, i simply said that larger companies opposed to smaller always go where the money is over principles for many factors like investors, staff growth etc and you can see this trend over and over, do you disagree ?

I have never said we shouldn't do anything or making excuses for it, i disagree how it was handled but that doesn't mean you can't make observations about how businesses works, is it right that money goes before ethics ? no but it is whether you want it or not how most larger business conduct themselves.

The moral argument however injected into every message is lazy while completely ignoring why things are as they are.
avatar
Time4Tea: So it seems that our main disagreement then is that you object to the concept of public protest? You want public protests about moral issues to be silenced and suppressed, because it is inconvenient for you to have to hear them/read them?

There is a good reason why people protest issues in public - to draw attention to their causes and reach out to others who may feel a similar way. To go back to my earlier example, would the protests in favor of women's voting rights have been successful, if those supporting it had simply stayed at home and stayed quiet? Would any of the successful consumer boycotts listed here have been successful, if they hadn't been publicized?

You don't have to agree with the boycott or join it, that's fine. You're entitled to your opinion and to disagree, of course. But please don't try to silence us or suggest that we shouldn't be making our protest in public. As far as I am concerned, that is effectively an attack the principles of free speech and free protest.

You don't like the boycott? Don't agree with the protest? Ignore it and walk away then. Simple.
I thought i have made this clear many times previously in this thread, i don't care what you do or any boycotter for that matter but it does come across as weird when someone brings that to an discussion that isn't really about boycotting, you have set your bar for what you tolerate and act according to them that's perfectly fine.
What i'm getting tired of is pointing out over and over is when you say that money influence how a company behaves something you see in dozens and dozens of companies over the span of many years (observation), somebody is going to make a argument about ethics (money and companies) and somehow connect that with defending a company because that is what they want to see whether it's true or not.

So lets clear up a few things:

I do not agree with how the Devotion debacle was handled and wish it could be reversed even if i don't care the slightest about the game itself.

I do not like the Chinese government and their influence over many companies even though i understand the temptation for companies but i don't see the refusal of selling one indie game is going to change much. If it gets worse eventually then that's one thing but one would have more luck engaging in real politics and try to make an effort in your own country than on some backwater forum about games which basically no one cares about.

I have nothing against your thread of boycotting and certainly don't want to silence it but nor do i want to be constantly misinterpreted by folks saying i am making excuses by making rational arguments why these things happen.
There are people washing away any problem but that's certainly not me, saying that money has power even over ethics is simply a statement of facts and does not mean you should lie down and accept it.
¨
So do you finally understand what it is am trying to say ?

This is the post that started it all:

Companies goes where the money is and that's how it is thus statements are useless, neither Steam, Epic or any mid to larger scale company (meaning when you open up your company for public investing you are pretty much expected to go where the profit is) would risk being shut off from selling their games in china.

There aren't any excuses or endorsement of how they acted here, this is simply company thinking and whether it's right or wrong is up to each individual to decide.
Post edited August 16, 2021 by ChrisG_
low rated
avatar
ChrisG_: So do you finally understand what it is am trying to say ?
I'm not sure, to be honest. I'm still trying to figure it out ...

avatar
ChrisG_: This is the post that started it all:

Companies goes where the money is and that's how it is thus statements are useless, neither Steam, Epic or any mid to larger scale company (meaning when you open up your company for public investing you are pretty much expected to go where the profit is) would risk being shut off from selling their games in china.

There aren't any excuses or endorsement of how they acted here, this is simply company thinking and whether it's right or wrong is up to each individual to decide.
Ok. Well, the way I read that is that you seem to basically be saying the following:

1. Companies care about profit and not ethics. They will do whatever is necessary to make money.

2. Therefore, you seem to be implying that it is futile to expect companies to observe ethical standards or to try to criticize or hold them accountable for their ethical conduct.

If that is your opinion, then fair enough. You are of course entitled to your opinion. However, if that is an accurate representation of your statements, then I strongly disagree.

Imo, the first point would be a big over-simplification, to say that all businesses are driven by profit and profit alone. There are many examples I could think of of businesses that care about ethics, even some that have built their reputations largely based on ethical considerations. The Body Shop retail chain in the UK strongly oppose the use of animal testing in cosmetics. Whole Foods Market take a principled stance against foods that contain artificial colors and preservatives. Of course, as previously mentioned, GOG built its reputation by pitching themselves as 'the good guys' and opposing DRM in games. Furthermore, many corporations recently have become more concerned about integrity and corporate responsibility.

For the second point, even if the first were true, I would not agree that a boycott is futile. I have already shown a list of successful consumer boycotts that have been held in the past. If we want to see companies behaving in a more ethical manner, then imo it is very important that we insist on companies that we deal with meeting those standards and hold them accountable if they don't.

So, on those points we may have to agree to disagree.


And then on top of all this is the unavoidable irony that China has recently been cracking down on video games companies (with a resulting drop in the share prices of Tencent and Netease). So, it seems that all these companies that are selling their souls to access the Chinese market are taking quite a risk. Because China is not a free market, regardless of how much western corporate execs might try to convince themselves otherwise. China can and will pull the rug out from under al of these companies, as soon as it is in their interest to do so.
Post edited August 16, 2021 by Time4Tea
low rated
avatar
ChrisG_: ....one would have more luck engaging in real politics and try to make an effort in your own country than on some backwater forum about games which basically no one cares about.
*cough cough*
avatar
Time4Tea: I'm still trying to figure it out ...
While you do so, I figured i'd ping ya in case you might like to read the good news in the link above if you haven't already. ;)
Post edited August 18, 2021 by GamezRanker
low rated
avatar
ChrisG_: So do you finally understand what it is am trying to say ?
avatar
Time4Tea: I'm not sure, to be honest. I'm still trying to figure it out ...

avatar
ChrisG_: This is the post that started it all:

Companies goes where the money is and that's how it is thus statements are useless, neither Steam, Epic or any mid to larger scale company (meaning when you open up your company for public investing you are pretty much expected to go where the profit is) would risk being shut off from selling their games in china.

There aren't any excuses or endorsement of how they acted here, this is simply company thinking and whether it's right or wrong is up to each individual to decide.
avatar
Time4Tea: Ok. Well, the way I read that is that you seem to basically be saying the following:

1. Companies care about profit and not ethics. They will do whatever is necessary to make money.

2. Therefore, you seem to be implying that it is futile to expect companies to observe ethical standards or to try to criticize or hold them accountable for their ethical conduct.

If that is your opinion, then fair enough. You are of course entitled to your opinion. However, if that is an accurate representation of your statements, then I strongly disagree.

Imo, the first point would be a big over-simplification, to say that all businesses are driven by profit and profit alone. There are many examples I could think of of businesses that care about ethics, even some that have built their reputations largely based on ethical considerations. The Body Shop retail chain in the UK strongly oppose the use of animal testing in cosmetics. Whole Foods Market take a principled stance against foods that contain artificial colors and preservatives. Of course, as previously mentioned, GOG built its reputation by pitching themselves as 'the good guys' and opposing DRM in games. Furthermore, many corporations recently have become more concerned about integrity and corporate responsibility.

For the second point, even if the first were true, I would not agree that a boycott is futile. I have already shown a list of successful consumer boycotts that have been held in the past. If we want to see companies behaving in a more ethical manner, then imo it is very important that we insist on companies that we deal with meeting those standards and hold them accountable if they don't.

So, on those points we may have to agree to disagree.

And then on top of all this is the unavoidable irony that China has recently been cracking down on video games companies (with a resulting drop in the share prices of Tencent and Netease). So, it seems that all these companies that are selling their souls to access the Chinese market are taking quite a risk. Because China is not a free market, regardless of how much western corporate execs might try to convince themselves otherwise. China can and will pull the rug out from under al of these companies, as soon as it is in their interest to do so.
Sorry for the late reply, had some things to do but i will try to be more clear with this reply.

It's close to what i think but i will like to make some changes.

1. It ofc depends on the company and the people who represent it but in general making money seem more important than acting to the value they say they stand for like Blizzard and Hong Kong, censoring skeletons in their games, workers and more, EA caring about players or the multitude of companies making use of chinese labor while spouting of how good and moral they are.

2. I don't think we should "expect" but rather wish they would uphold the ethical standard they are promoting and as for boycotting, this is something i rarely do but i would if something got bad enough and there is no other way around change but i'm more of the mind of observing before boycotting.
As for the effeciency of boycotting, yes there boycotts who absolutely succeed but it's hard especially within entertaiment when most average joes who make up the majority of the market don't look twice about anything they buy and just consume.
In the thread of boycotting where you list the specific issues you have a problem with, you said earlier in this thread that there is 100 boycotters but that is over the span of around 7-8 months since that day now and users come and go so tbh that is not a lot.

Yes China is not a free maket and you will need the governments approval to do business there which is you know something we all have mixed feelings about but is a very large market and growing by the day so it's certainly attractive to sell your games there although the governments willingness to crack down on companies and people they don't like makes it unreliable in the long term.

Also a little reply to GamezRanker, they have not changed yet though and there is only EAs words so far except for Ultima Underworld and Syndicate but will it continue ? we'll see but i hope they will start paying attention to releasing drm free games again or at the very least not remove eveything just because they want to erase their classics.
That wasn't preaching though but voicing displeasure of those games removals, preaching to me is telling people how to be ethical about something according to their own moral compass.
Post edited August 18, 2021 by ChrisG_
low rated
avatar
ChrisG_: As for the effeciency of boycotting, yes there boycotts who absolutely succeed but it's hard especially within entertaiment when most average joes who make up the majority of the market don't look twice about anything they buy and just consume.
This is sadly true....which is partly why I myself don't boycott much: i.e. the buyers often outnumber the boycotters.
Me? I'm more into reverse boycotts....i.e. buying more from companies I respect/admire a bit more.

avatar
ChrisG_: .....there is 100 boycotters but that is over the span of around 7-8 months since that day now and users come and go so tbh that is not a lot.
Well as you said above, many do less boycotting and more consuming....also not many goggers use these forums. The wishlist entry did get 8-9k votes in a very short time, though, which was somewhat impressive.

avatar
ChrisG_: Also a little reply to GamezRanker, they have not changed yet though and there is only EAs words so far except for Ultima Underworld and Syndicate but will it continue?
It's likely just them trying to get good PR and etc for the most part, I admit, but it does show that companies do listen sometimes to such efforts.

avatar
ChrisG_: we'll see but i hope they will start paying attention to releasing drm free games again or at the very least not remove eveything just because they want to erase their classics.
My belief is they might want to saturate the market with free copies of the game, hence the one month giveaway of the games, so they can maybe delist them later due to poor sales. I hope i'm wrong on that, though.

avatar
ChrisG_: That wasn't preaching though but voicing displeasure of those games removals, preaching to me is telling people how to be ethical about something according to their own moral compass.
Well some did get a bit preachy about the delisting here and there. That aside, I was more pointing out that efforts on gaming forums can bear fruit from time to time.
Post edited August 19, 2021 by GamezRanker
low rated
avatar
amok: They did release a statement on Twitter - https://twitter.com/GOGcom/status/1339227388438306817

You might not have liked the statement, but you can't really say that did not release any.
That statement is what i was talking about, they blamed the " gamers " for it's removal. People where and still are pissed at them, they have yet to reply to that, stop trying to give false answers.
avatar
JakobFel: It had jack crap to do with "catering" to China. It had everything to do with being a business and doing what they have to do. Given the fact that China has a very large gaming market, they couldn't risk losing an entire market over one game that a handful of people might have played.

The way people responded to the situation just proves my point about modern gamers being fickle, whiny crybabies who are literally LOOKING for reasons to complain.
Modern crybabies, wow you really live in a fantasy world, you don't see the big picture here, and that is we don't need China Censorship in Europe, America or any other Country, Freedom of Speech is Sacred, maybe you don't like it, but some of us do. The game has nothing to do with " a reason to complain ". It has everything to do with the fact that i don't need China to tell me what and where to buy something i want. Gog selling themselves for cash is low.
Post edited August 20, 2021 by lixicus
low rated
avatar
GamezRanker: Or maybe some have a legitimate complaint, but you are so enamored by GOG that you refuse to see it & call people whiners to maintain your cognitive dissonance?
avatar
JakobFel: It's not a legitimate complaint, though. People act as if GOG "catered" to China or removed the game to spite certain groups of people which simply isn't true. Anyone who knows even a little bit about business knows that you don't risk an entire market to satisfy a handful of customers. That's just not how it works. Yeah, sure, it sucks that they had to remove it but if ANYONE is to blame for this, it's the ridiculous CCP which absolutely needs to fall.

Also, it's not the fanboys downvoting, it's bots and that's an issue GOG definitely needs to fix.
avatar
Ancient-Red-Dragon: The second sentence in that quotation contradicts, undermines, and disproves the first.

And the rest of that post is basically saying that one should abandon all of his/her ethics & morals for financial reasons.

Of course, in reality, no they should not.

Contrary to what the rest of the post which I quoted from says, the only problem with the GOG customers' response to the Devotion debacle was that they, for the most part, let GOG get away with letting it blow over, which is exactly what GOG hoped would happen.

And that sets the very dire precedent for all future debacles, which GOG is likewise also probably going to ignore, since the Devotion incident taught them that most customers will let them get away with letting it blow over, and hence they have no reason to be transparent about what is really going on.

Finally, that post is conflating two separate issues into one, even though they cannot & should not be conflated:

Issue 1: GOG banning Devotion.
Issue 2: GOG lying about the reason for why they banned Devotion, and refusing to be transparent and upfront and honest about the real reason why they did so.
avatar
JakobFel: It has nothing to do with morals. GOG removed the game to preserve a market of theirs. The morals only come into play when you consider the sheer tyranny of the CCP. As I said, blame the CCP, not GOG because it's not GOG's fault that the CCP are a bunch of tyrannical, oppressive fools.
Yes blame the bully not the ones helping him be the bully in the first place, nice logic ... GOG is an accomplice. Freedom of Speech should never be negotiable no matter the price. If GOG had the balls to admit ok guys look we removed it cause we don't want to lose the Chinese market, then sure i'd give them credit for at least admitting to it, but they cowered like mice, i don't know about you but why would you want to mess with such entity that at any second can blame you for their action ;).