It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Fact is that rules where not clear. There was no phrase within the rules where was written 'you cant make more than one entry' and i made a couple of them. My posts have been erased somehow... Really disappointing but I think it was a lottery, just make the ones with less than 8 words and with the word cyberpunk in it disappear and then random pick. If it was good enough or just not bad it would be the winner.

Edit: What Im reying to say is that the competition was not fixed but I think there wasnt any competition at all.
Post edited June 22, 2020 by velnas
avatar
Mori_Yuki: The contest wasn't about promoting the game but to describe it in 8 words. Looking at the winning line it isn't a description of the game but a truism.
avatar
Orpheus-GOG: THIS is without a doubt the real point here. And like d6nxyzrwk said everything boils down to GOG's inability to be perfectly clear with their rules. That's the core issue and the one some blue should be addressing imho.
Was it "describe the game"? Was it "create the perfect slogan"? Was it "create an original/funny/whatever sentence"? There's a HUGE difference between all of those. And it can have a huge impact on someone's winning chances.
The wording was clear enough: Describe the game. It seems to me that many participants were trying hard to come up with the perfect sales pitch line instead of describing the game - me including! A description, going by dictionary definition of the word, would mean to me something like this:

Experience artificial immanence in a dystopian cybernetic subculture

I second your wish for an official statement. They could at least tell us why they were using the word describe and provide us with an example to see what it means to them.
Post edited June 22, 2020 by Mori_Yuki
avatar
d6nxyzrwk: I (like many others) fell into the trap (as suggested by Artogrimous) of injecting the game’s title in the entry (which before I didn’t feel entirely broke the rules, but now in retrospective I feel like I should have taken the path of those who ignored this idea altogether).
If someone is a rules-lawyer they would find that it's a violation. I would hold that it isn't if you don't use the word Cyberpunk as a word, which you can't, because in that case you would have to have used 9 words instead of 8 and you had been out. ;-)

avatar
d6nxyzrwk: Since English is not my native language, I used what I found in my vocabulary...
The GOG team of all people must know that there would be many participants whose native language isn't English. I have seen that others were using their native language and to me there is no reason to suspect that GOG ruled them out because of that. Without official word that's mere speculation of course ...

I like your video, great job!
Post edited April 07, 2022 by d6nxyzrwk
avatar
velnas: I think there wasnt any competition at all.
This is a great 8-word description of the competition!
Post edited June 23, 2020 by General_A_S
avatar
Mori_Yuki: The wording was clear enough: Describe the game. It seems to me that many participants were trying hard to come up with the perfect sales pitch line instead of describing the game
(...)
They could at least tell us why they were using the word describe and provide us with an example to see what it means to them.
And yet...we ended up with a winning entry that, like you said, is NOT a description. So... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I agree with you. I thought they were clear enough: "describe" is pretty clear. But then again...someone at GOG selected a NON-DESCRIPTION as the winning entry, invalidating all the already established "clearness" imo.

I also fell for the trap of thinking "sales pitch lines". And that's why I went with something more in line with the "descriptive" thing, thinking that going with anything different would be disqualifying. Apparently I was wrong.
Lol, I totally focused on the "creativity" part. Since I remember that previous GOG-contests were mostly won by poems and similar stuff, I made a haiku. I was sure that all contestants who contributed a simple 8-word line would be disqualified.
I wonder how many side account were made just to participate in this. I guess GOG wanted a larger number of accounts to show a high number.
avatar
Themken: I wonder how many side account were made just to participate in this. I guess GOG wanted a larger number of accounts to show a high number.
That was my thought. Metrics generally point which way a company decision, and some higher ups get so focused on the numbers for their projects, that they find ways to bring up those numbers in ways that justify their position.
low rated
As a community we should demand transparency and the answers of who won and what the winning phrase was.
avatar
Crevurre: As a community we should demand transparency and the answers of who won and what the winning phrase was.
They announced the winning account name when they locked the thread.
low rated
avatar
Crevurre: As a community we should demand transparency and the answers of who won and what the winning phrase was.
avatar
TheMonkofDestiny: They announced the winning account name when they locked the thread.
I don't understand why no one is pissed about it.
avatar
Crevurre: I don't understand why no one is pissed about it.
Seemed like a number of people were, considering other threads. Continuing to raise hell over it even though it was closed, the winner likely already contacted and the prize mailed to them seems a bit like screaming at a wall in hopes that eventually it will respond.
low rated
avatar
Crevurre: I don't understand why no one is pissed about it.
avatar
TheMonkofDestiny: Seemed like a number of people were, considering other threads. Continuing to raise hell over it even though it was closed, the winner likely already contacted and the prize mailed to them seems a bit like screaming at a wall in hopes that eventually it will respond.
The next step is to then find out why there are low standards in these companies, and how it came to be. The community will have contacts that facilitate this.
avatar
TheMonkofDestiny: Seemed like a number of people were, considering other threads. Continuing to raise hell over it even though it was closed, the winner likely already contacted and the prize mailed to them seems a bit like screaming at a wall in hopes that eventually it will respond.
Criticism has a small chance to trigger improvement, me thinks.