Posted December 14, 2021
low rated
On Gothic 2's page, I encountered this under one of the reviews:
"Gothic 2 is, simply put, a diamond in the rough. It came out only a few months after TES 3: Morrowind, but has gameplay elements that were clearly copied in TES 4: Oblivion. The sad thing is, is that most people who've played Oblivion don't even realize that "Radiant AI" and "NPC Schedules" had already been done in Gothic - and to boot, are far superior to Bethesda's disappointing attempt."
As I was reading the comment, I started feeling weird. What? Since when is Oblivion the standard for AI? What's going on?
Then I realized. The review was from 2010.
Do you ever get an existential crisis from reading old reviews? Do you feel the passage of time in gaming?
"Gothic 2 is, simply put, a diamond in the rough. It came out only a few months after TES 3: Morrowind, but has gameplay elements that were clearly copied in TES 4: Oblivion. The sad thing is, is that most people who've played Oblivion don't even realize that "Radiant AI" and "NPC Schedules" had already been done in Gothic - and to boot, are far superior to Bethesda's disappointing attempt."
As I was reading the comment, I started feeling weird. What? Since when is Oblivion the standard for AI? What's going on?
Then I realized. The review was from 2010.
Do you ever get an existential crisis from reading old reviews? Do you feel the passage of time in gaming?