karnak1: They could even engage Richard Garriott to return as Lord British again (in fact it'd be the only way they'd get to make a new Ultima because of copyright ownership),
Breja: Doesn't Ultima belong to EA? I'm pretty sure I remember them releasing some shitty online Lord of Ultima thing a few years back. And when Garriott made his new shitty online Ultima thing he couldn't actually call it Ultima, which is why we got Shroud of the Avatar.
If I remember correctly, it's a bit of a copyright mess. EA has the rights to the Ultima series but I think they're not allowed to make a new Ultima game unless they obtain permission from Garriott because of intelectual property. And that's probably why EA never dared to use the Ultima setting again (which would generate massive hype over the RPG community and likely make tons of $$$$, if done correctly).
But I could very well be mistaken and EA has 100% ownership over the IP and they just don't care.
Breja: Conan is not nearly as interesting and nuanced character as Geralt
theslitherydeee: Conan is more nuanced than a lot of people give him credit for. But a lot of it is psychological, deriving from his unique perspective on civilization, that has to be inferred. He will rob a noble woman because she has more than enough, then beat up an entire bar to protect a hungry beggar whose being abused.
Well, since there was already an old Conan game, we may just as well use the
Wishlist if anyone is interested:
https://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/conan_the_cimmerian https://www.mobygames.com/game/conan-the-cimmerian