It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
For the rest of us who are on the fence which one to get. Thanks!
No posts in this topic were marked as the solution yet. If you can help, add your reply
It would be between CC3 and CC5.

5 has the better range of mods and the strategic map but 3 has a better sense of progression and scale through the campaign.

In short, get both [when 5 arrives on gog].

Once you've got them and played them for a bit, then get:

For CC3 - Der ost front and Finmod

For CC5 - Okinawa, Meuse, Gold Juno Sword

Make sure to get a sound mod as well for the games.
Sounds like a good recommendation.

To really say which one, I should have tried them all, but I haven't... My answer is Close Combat III though.

Close combat 1 seemed really primitive, CC2 was a great achievement in game development, CC3 took it a little further and allowed for larger teams. Then after CC3 you might think things improve gradually with each release: CC4 and CC5 and the Matrix games rehashes: CC3-COI, CC4-WAR, CC5-TLD, CC(2)-LSA, CC-PitF, CC-GWtC. But note this; contrary to expectations things don't gradually improve. AFAIK There is no real change in the core game since CC3. Some things improve (especially things that do not involve the core game) , while some other small things get a bit worse (girly soldier behaviour in the matrix releases, where they forget the order you gave them + mistakes in the heightmaps thus lines of fire). Besides that it depends on what part of WW2 is featured in each game, but the games are moddable to such an extend that you can convert any of those games to another subject.
high rated
avatar
gerwin79: Sounds like a good recommendation.

To really say which one, I should have tried them all, but I haven't... My answer is Close Combat III though.

Close combat 1 seemed really primitive, CC2 was a great achievement in game development, CC3 took it a little further and allowed for larger teams. Then after CC3 you might think things improve gradually with each release: CC4 and CC5 and the Matrix games rehashes: CC3-COI, CC4-WAR, CC5-TLD, CC(2)-LSA, CC-PitF, CC-GWtC. But note this; contrary to expectations things don't gradually improve. AFAIK There is no real change in the core game since CC3. Some things improve (especially things that do not involve the core game) , while some other small things get a bit worse (girly soldier behaviour in the matrix releases, where they forget the order you gave them + mistakes in the heightmaps thus lines of fire). Besides that it depends on what part of WW2 is featured in each game, but the games are moddable to such an extend that you can convert any of those games to another subject.
This is a pretty good summary. To add to that:

I've got reviews for CC3 and Gateway to Caen:
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/pc/96044-close-combat-iii-the-russian-front-pc/reviews/164016
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/pc/799671-close-combat-gateway-to-caen-pc/reviews/162050

CC2 had the most brutal infantry combat, lots of rushes and hand to hand combat. The structure of the campaign was interesting if a little confusing at times and having a range of forces to use was excellent. Has great explosions as well.

CC3 has the best sense of progression with your troops and a simple but effective campaign structure. The tank battles are excellent and the infantry are vicious. Weather conditions play a part in your strategy and it has a good selection of mods. The Eastern Front makes a welcome change also.

CC4 has lousy requisition options and the tank combat is pretty iffy. The shift to a winter setting is a nice continuance from CC3 and the snipers are excellent. Infantry have the same ferocity as in CC3. Strategic map is a bit iffy as well. Not a very good menu system either with a lack of information compared to CC3.

CC5 has the best I think range of mods. A simple and effective strategic map compared to CC4. Infantry are even more vicious, armoured combat is back to a good standard. It's on par with CC3 for me. Nicely sized maps, good range of environments and challenges make for an all round excellent entry in the series. The menu system is clear, effective and a welcome improvement on CC4.

Cross of Iron - avoid, you can get CC3 with Der Ost Front.

I keep on forgetting that I have Last Stand Arnhem. It's not a bad remake of CC2 but it's not quite as good as CC2 either. Map size and pacing can be a bit of a problem. Overall though it plays well enough and the night flares are a nice inclusion.

Gateway to Caen can be very good and very boring. The maps are even bigger causing pacing problems, the visuals are great. Infantry are better than they have been in previous remakes and aside from some questionable accuracy issues and tendency to throw tracks the armoured combat is better than previous remakes. There are some issues with vehicle pathfinding and their obsession with roads which have gotten more than a few vehicles blown up while playing for me. Still, overall it's not a bad entry in the series.
Wow, very well-thought out and passionate insights about the games. Thanks for your input, pulling the trigger on CC3!
avatar
gerwin79: Sounds like a good recommendation.

To really say which one, I should have tried them all, but I haven't... My answer is Close Combat III though.

Close combat 1 seemed really primitive, CC2 was a great achievement in game development, CC3 took it a little further and allowed for larger teams. Then after CC3 you might think things improve gradually with each release: CC4 and CC5 and the Matrix games rehashes: CC3-COI, CC4-WAR, CC5-TLD, CC(2)-LSA, CC-PitF, CC-GWtC. But note this; contrary to expectations things don't gradually improve. AFAIK There is no real change in the core game since CC3. Some things improve (especially things that do not involve the core game) , while some other small things get a bit worse (girly soldier behaviour in the matrix releases, where they forget the order you gave them + mistakes in the heightmaps thus lines of fire). Besides that it depends on what part of WW2 is featured in each game, but the games are moddable to such an extend that you can convert any of those games to another subject.
avatar
Hicks233: This is a pretty good summary. To add to that:

I've got reviews for CC3 and Gateway to Caen:
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/pc/96044-close-combat-iii-the-russian-front-pc/reviews/164016
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/pc/799671-close-combat-gateway-to-caen-pc/reviews/162050

CC2 had the most brutal infantry combat, lots of rushes and hand to hand combat. The structure of the campaign was interesting if a little confusing at times and having a range of forces to use was excellent. Has great explosions as well.

CC3 has the best sense of progression with your troops and a simple but effective campaign structure. The tank battles are excellent and the infantry are vicious. Weather conditions play a part in your strategy and it has a good selection of mods. The Eastern Front makes a welcome change also.

CC4 has lousy requisition options and the tank combat is pretty iffy. The shift to a winter setting is a nice continuance from CC3 and the snipers are excellent. Infantry have the same ferocity as in CC3. Strategic map is a bit iffy as well. Not a very good menu system either with a lack of information compared to CC3.

CC5 has the best I think range of mods. A simple and effective strategic map compared to CC4. Infantry are even more vicious, armoured combat is back to a good standard. It's on par with CC3 for me. Nicely sized maps, good range of environments and challenges make for an all round excellent entry in the series. The menu system is clear, effective and a welcome improvement on CC4.

Cross of Iron - avoid, you can get CC3 with Der Ost Front.

I keep on forgetting that I have Last Stand Arnhem. It's not a bad remake of CC2 but it's not quite as good as CC2 either. Map size and pacing can be a bit of a problem. Overall though it plays well enough and the night flares are a nice inclusion.

Gateway to Caen can be very good and very boring. The maps are even bigger causing pacing problems, the visuals are great. Infantry are better than they have been in previous remakes and aside from some questionable accuracy issues and tendency to throw tracks the armoured combat is better than previous remakes. There are some issues with vehicle pathfinding and their obsession with roads which have gotten more than a few vehicles blown up while playing for me. Still, overall it's not a bad entry in the series.
I can feel the passion you guys have for the game, thanks!
Post edited February 12, 2018 by Sarhento
avatar
Sarhento: Wow, very well-thought out and passionate insights about the games. Thanks for your input, pulling the trigger on CC3!
avatar
Hicks233: This is a pretty good summary. To add to that:

I've got reviews for CC3 and Gateway to Caen:
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/pc/96044-close-combat-iii-the-russian-front-pc/reviews/164016
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/pc/799671-close-combat-gateway-to-caen-pc/reviews/162050

CC2 had the most brutal infantry combat, lots of rushes and hand to hand combat. The structure of the campaign was interesting if a little confusing at times and having a range of forces to use was excellent. Has great explosions as well.

CC3 has the best sense of progression with your troops and a simple but effective campaign structure. The tank battles are excellent and the infantry are vicious. Weather conditions play a part in your strategy and it has a good selection of mods. The Eastern Front makes a welcome change also.

CC4 has lousy requisition options and the tank combat is pretty iffy. The shift to a winter setting is a nice continuance from CC3 and the snipers are excellent. Infantry have the same ferocity as in CC3. Strategic map is a bit iffy as well. Not a very good menu system either with a lack of information compared to CC3.

CC5 has the best I think range of mods. A simple and effective strategic map compared to CC4. Infantry are even more vicious, armoured combat is back to a good standard. It's on par with CC3 for me. Nicely sized maps, good range of environments and challenges make for an all round excellent entry in the series. The menu system is clear, effective and a welcome improvement on CC4.

Cross of Iron - avoid, you can get CC3 with Der Ost Front.

I keep on forgetting that I have Last Stand Arnhem. It's not a bad remake of CC2 but it's not quite as good as CC2 either. Map size and pacing can be a bit of a problem. Overall though it plays well enough and the night flares are a nice inclusion.

Gateway to Caen can be very good and very boring. The maps are even bigger causing pacing problems, the visuals are great. Infantry are better than they have been in previous remakes and aside from some questionable accuracy issues and tendency to throw tracks the armoured combat is better than previous remakes. There are some issues with vehicle pathfinding and their obsession with roads which have gotten more than a few vehicles blown up while playing for me. Still, overall it's not a bad entry in the series.
avatar
Sarhento: I can feel the passion you guys have for the game, thanks!
If you haven't already, make sure to check the forums and mod database at: http://www.closecombatseries.net.

Hope you enjoy playing and I'm sure if you have questions the people here and especially at the above website will be happy to help. I just hope that they can get CC5 fixed up and made available here. It work on Win7 already but it'd be good to have a longer term compatible version available and the mods available for it are brilliant.
Sorry for necroing a post that's over a year old. Just want to give an update.

Since having purchased CC3, it's been one of the few games that has me glued from start to finish. Learning curve is there but I managed. Coming from more mainstream RTS/Tactics games CC series sets itself apart from the pack to me.

I remembered this thread while looking for recommendations. I picked up CC5 on sale just now. After playing both campaigns maybe I'll tinker with the mods.

Again, thanks for keeping the CC community alive!
I would also recommend Close Combat: The Longest Day (Matrix games remake) over Close Combat V : Invasion Normandy. It has numerous improvements and a lot more maps!!