Currently the game is showing 4.5 stars from 15 users. Rating sounds good (but the sample size is small).

The game has 4 reviews, one 4 star, two 2 stars, and a 1 star. Regardless of whether the reviews are fair/useful/etc, this seems very strange.

These four reviews have an average of 2.2 stars. All 15 ratings (which should include these reviews) have an average of 4.5 stars.

Lets assume the other eleven people all gave the game 5 stars. The average rating should be (4+2+2+1+5*11)/15 = 4.27. This would round to 4.5. Its possible all 11 of the other people gave the game 5 stars.

Lets assume one of the other eleven people gave this game only 4 starts. The average rating should be (4+2+2+1+4+5*10)/15 = 4.2. This would round to 4. So all eleven other people appear to have given the game 5 stars.

So four people gave an average rating of 2.2 and a reason, eleven people gave a rating of 5 and no reason.

Weird.

Yes your'e right about the ratings. Probably most people gave it 4 or 5 stars because it was one of their favourite games back in the day.

Let's say it's a divisive game.

I wrote the 4 star review, but reading those other reviews, their criticisms are totally reasonable and correct. It's a hard game to judge I think.