Posted on: December 15, 2018

maddpsyintyst
Games: 40 Reviews: 11
Not Good, Not Bad
Having spent time on the Through The Looking Glass (TTLG) forums during the initial days of the development of the 2014 Thief reboot, I read a lot about Thief 3, and did not have my hopes up that it would be a decent sequel. Most of the complaints I read about were related to the removal of the swimming ability, the complete alteration of Garrett's loadout, the relative smallness of the levels and areas, and other things. I decided to try it, anyway. When I finally got my copy on Steam and played it, I found it to be a different enough game that I felt like I was NOT playing a proper sequel to T1 or T2--at least not the same way that T2 was to T1. This was due to the use of an entirely different game engine. T3 definitely had its moments, though. Visually, it was an improvement over the first two--but things like that are not AS important to me as gameplay, and I found myself missing what was missing. It's still WAY better than the reboot, though, and better than many other games I've played for its relative openness. T3 was intended to be more open world, but this was unachievable at the time for the studio. The result was a lot more loading times for smaller levels that made me feel like I might have overlooked too much (again, compared to T1 and T2). There are supposedly mods for this game, or else links to those mods, available through TTLG that open the world up and make it smoother to play, but I haven't tried those, and I doubt they'd work on my Steam copy. In short, if you took my advice as given in the T1 and T2 reviews I left (they're the same review, actually), you can skip this one and live happily ever after. If you DON'T skip this one, don't expect more of the same as what you got in T1 and T2. It truly is like playing a different game that shares the franchise name; but you might still enjoy it. I'm still trying to decide if I liked it enough to play it again. I have no such problems with T1 and T2.
Is this helpful to you?