Posted on: November 13, 2019

sardaukar

Games: 407 Reviews: 4

A deeply flawed but fascinating game

The Settlers II is not a bad game. Hell, I've spent *many* a night playing the original DOS version and now on Windows via this DOSbox release. But it's deeply flawed in the sense that you have at times very little control over what goes on. You have some tools at your disposal to order which goods take priority over others, but they're ineffective and will just frustrate you. Control over the military is also thin, and overall the page is just so, so slow. On the Roman campaign, at around level IV, you reach a stalemate because all coal has been mined, there's no more stone to power your catapults, and the enemy isn't moving either because they're out of stone to rebuild the guardhouses your catapults just destroyed. Also, your catapults take over 5 hits to destroy a guardhouse, but the enemy destroys yours with one hit. Once this happens, you're a couple of hours in and you feel totally frustrated. I really WANT to love this game - the concept is good, and the pixel art is charming, but I've never figured out how to not make it a slog.

Is this helpful to you?

Posted on: March 21, 2022

domfliss

Verified owner

Games: 195 Reviews: 4

Happy Memories...

Settlers 2 brings back so many happy memories, as it was the game which introduced my wife (then girlfriend) to PC gaming! When we get the time, we now play the open-source equivalent, Widelands, which is highly recommended.

Is this helpful to you?

Posted on: March 14, 2011

brother-eros

Verified owner

Games: 1865 Reviews: 3

The Golden Age of The Settlers

The Settlers 2 has always been my favourite in the series, having played every one since the very first on an Amiga 500. For those who may have played some of the newer titles, the differences in the earlier iterations make this more like a simulation than traditional RTS, and your enjoyment will probably vary accordingly. Blue Byte has recently returned to the military strategies of the first two games in its seventh release, where orders are issued but military units engage on their own. Micromanagament here is that of the development of your empire. The graphics are adorable, and individual citizens will not only travel to and from their work, level fields for building, cut down trees and mine for gold, but individually seed crops, grow pigs, bake bread, and hammer away at a smithy's anvil. This is still a rare feature these days, even more so when first released. You may find some elements similar with for instance Lords of the Realm, or Stronghold, but the Settlers takes the city building more seriously, and your troops are individual heroes who level up and duel each other. Those who are lovers of guerilla warefare may be dissappointed at first, but on a closer look this is another area where the game truly shines, with its own tactical and strategic nuances which play a huge part in offence and defence. If you can find a weak spot in your rivals fortifications, a small force can target that specific entrenchment, effectively destroying supply lines, bottlenecking cities, and finding your way to victory. I mention this because it is perhaps the unsung strength of The Settlers, which surpasses the unfortunate mass and rush tactics of many strategy games. Of course, the joy in developing your own city is a huge strength as well, and watching your cute denizens (and donkeys) go about their tasks amuses no ends. Think of the lemmings or smurfs and you begin to get a good idea. Now give them swords. :)

Is this helpful to you?

Posted on: October 21, 2011

Franpa

Verified owner

Games: 279 Reviews: 2

Hilarious re-release

This particular version of the game was hilarious for two simple reasons. 1) They included around 10,000 fan made maps on the disc. 2) This version of the game does not let you build Harbors. Because of point #2, the majority of fan made maps are not beatable xD

Is this helpful to you?

Posted on: May 2, 2023

Salmanasar

Verified owner

Games: 680 Reviews: 5

Game of my childhood.

It's still as good as I've remembered it. I like the gameplay, I like the story, I like the music and I LOVE the graphic. I have only a few complaints: first and foremost, the catapults are broken. You can shoot at your rival countries even without declaring them a war. Secondly, there's almost no strategy while at war. You just hope that your troops are gonna have a higher level and you'll have more of them than your enemy. Or just, you know, catapult him to death. My third and the biggest issue though, is that naval ports were completely removed from the game (outside of the few mandatory missions in the main campaign). Yes, they were broken and didn't work properly, but I'm sure this could be handled in a better way. If slytherine is allowed to sell their Blood Bowl 1 with a gamebreaking bug that limits your turn to just 20 seconds (which is WAY too quick for such a complex game), there's no reason why the very optional ships aren't here.

Is this helpful to you?

Discover CD PROJEKT RED games

Highlights

Featured

Close, but not an exact hit

The Settlers® 2: Gold Edition

Other ratings

Add a review

Edit a review

Delete this review?

Report this review

Additional Details (required):

Report this review